Experimental or precautionary? Adaptive management over a range of time horizons

作者: Cindy E Hauser , Hugh P Possingham

DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2007.01395.X

关键词:

摘要: Many studies of adaptive harvest management already exist in the literature, but most (if not all) use long, sometimes infinite, time horizons. Such long-term objectives provide an opportunity to manage experimentally, so that poorly understood dynamics are learned and any returns sacrificed for experimentation repaid by improved over remaining horizon. However, a manager is unlikely weight outcomes distant future equally against present. Furthermore, appropriate model system may remain constant time-frame required experiment, learn improve management. In these cases discounting and/or finite horizon fit manager's assumptions goals more effectively, value likely be diminished. this paper we construct simple hypothetical population compare optimal passive active strategies range This allows us determine level short-, medium- goals. We discover strategy precautionary short medium horizons, rather than experimental. That is, action with known moderate benefits preferred uncertain marginally larger expected benefits. runs counter widespread assumption literature incorporating learning into optimization will encourage experimentation. Synthesis applications. The general results have potential application environmental problem where might applied; example, conservation, pest control, harvesting water flows. examine horizons reflect variety possible assumptions. Our example demonstrates face uncertainty, maximizes does necessarily include deliberate learning. Optimal weighs all its consequences, can yield approach.

参考文章(26)
Miguel A. Pascual, Peter Kareiva, Ray Hilborn, The influence of model structure on conclusions about the viability and harvesting of Serengeti wildebeest Conservation Biology. ,vol. 11, pp. 966- 976 ,(1997) , 10.1046/J.1523-1739.1997.95437.X
Crawford S Holling, A. Bazykin, P. Bunnell, W.C. Clark, G.C. Gallopin, J. Gross, R. Hilborn, D.D Jones, R.M. Peterman, J.R. Rabinovich, J.H. Steele, C.J. Walters, Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management ,(2005)
Byron K. Williams, Uncertainty, learning, and the optimal management of wildlife Environmental and Ecological Statistics. ,vol. 8, pp. 269- 288 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1011395725123
A. D. M. Smith, Carl J. Walters, Adaptive Management of Stock–Recruitment Systems Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. ,vol. 38, pp. 690- 703 ,(1981) , 10.1139/F81-092
Sam H. Pearsall, Brian J. McCrodden, Philip A. Townsend, Adaptive management of flows in the lower Roanoke River, North Carolina, USA. Environmental Management. ,vol. 35, pp. 353- 367 ,(2005) , 10.1007/S00267-003-0255-3
Y. Bar-Shalom, Stochastic dynamic programming: Caution and probing IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. ,vol. 26, pp. 1184- 1195 ,(1981) , 10.1109/TAC.1981.1102793
William Silvert, The Price of Knowledge: Fisheries Management as a Research Tool Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. ,vol. 35, pp. 208- 212 ,(1978) , 10.1139/F78-034
MICHAEL A. McCARTHY, HUGH P. POSSINGHAM, Active Adaptive Management for Conservation Conservation Biology. ,vol. 21, pp. 956- 963 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2007.00677.X