Intact Forests in the United States: Proforestation Mitigates Climate Change and Serves the Greatest Good

作者: William R. Moomaw , Susan A. Masino , Edward K. Faison

DOI: 10.3389/FFGC.2019.00027

关键词:

摘要: Climate change and loss of biodiversity are widely recognized as the foremost environmental challenges our time. Forests annually sequester large quantities atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), store above below ground for long periods Intact forests – largely free from human intervention except primarily trails hazard removals - most carbon-dense biodiverse terrestrial ecosystems, with additional benefits to society economy. Internationally, focus has been on preventing tropical forests, yet U.S. temperate boreal remove sufficient CO2 reduce national annual net emissions by 11%. have potential much more rapid removal rates biological sequestration intact and/or older forests. The recent 1.5 Degree Warming Report Intergovernmental Panel Change identifies reforestation afforestation important strategies increase negative emissions, but they face significant challenges: requires an enormous amount land, neither strategy can growing young trees during critical next decade(s). In contrast, existing their ecological termed proforestation is a effective, immediate low-cost approach that could be mobilized across suitable all types. Proforestation serves greatest public good maximizing co-benefits such nature-based unparalleled ecosystem services enhancement, water air quality, flood erosion control, health benefits, low impact recreation scenic beauty.

参考文章(61)
Mark S. Boyce, Ecological-process management and ungulates: Yellowstone’s conservation paradigm Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 26, pp. 391- 398 ,(1998)
Sonja N. Oswalt, W. Brad Smith, Patrick D. Miles, Scott A. Pugh, Forest Resources of the United States, 2012: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 update of the RPA Assessment Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-91. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office. 218 p.. ,vol. 91, ,(2014) , 10.2737/WO-GTR-91
Brendan Mackey, Dominick A. DellaSala, Cyril Kormos, David Lindenmayer, Noelle Kumpel, Barbara Zimmerman, Sonia Hugh, Virginia Young, Sean Foley, Kriton Arsenis, James E.M. Watson, Policy Options for the World's Primary Forests in Multilateral Environmental Agreements Conservation Letters. ,vol. 8, pp. 139- 147 ,(2015) , 10.1111/CONL.12120
Y. Pan, J. M. Chen, R. Birdsey, K. McCullough, L. He, F. Deng, Age structure and disturbance legacy of North American forests Biogeosciences. ,vol. 8, pp. 715- 732 ,(2011) , 10.5194/BG-8-715-2011
Sebastiaan Luyssaert, E. -Detlef Schulze, Annett Börner, Alexander Knohl, Dominik Hessenmöller, Beverly E. Law, Philippe Ciais, John Grace, Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks Nature. ,vol. 455, pp. 213- 215 ,(2008) , 10.1038/NATURE07276
Sarah E. Goodwin, W. Gregory Shriver, Using a bird community index to evaluate national parks in the urbanized national capital region Urban Ecosystems. ,vol. 17, pp. 979- 990 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S11252-014-0363-2
Thomas Ranius, Mats Niklasson, Niclas Berg, Development of tree hollows in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) Forest Ecology and Management. ,vol. 257, pp. 303- 310 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.FORECO.2008.09.007
Clinton N. Jenkins, Kyle S. Van Houtan, Stuart L. Pimm, Joseph O. Sexton, US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 112, pp. 5081- 5086 ,(2015) , 10.1073/PNAS.1418034112
G. G. Whitney, The history and status of the hemlock-hardwood forests of the Allegheny Plateau. Journal of Ecology. ,vol. 78, pp. 443- 458 ,(1990) , 10.2307/2261123