The Economics of Gene Therapy and of Pharmacogenetics

作者: Patricia Danzon , Adrian Towse

DOI: 10.1046/J.1524-4733.2002.51081.X

关键词:

摘要: This paper focuses on the economic issues arising from two uses of genomics: 1) development gene therapy; 2) and use pharmacogenetics to identify a patient’s genotype before treatment exclude those who will not benefit or may be harmed. We conclude that private-sector investment aimed at developing therapy for monogenic diseases is likely socially suboptimal. Short-term administration regimens yielding long-term therapeutic benefits are meet payer resistance large “one-off” costs because budget constraints or, in competitive systems, concerns savings would accrue future insurers attract high-cost patients. For some diseases, patient numbers too small support commercial without changes orphan drug legislation willingness accept higher cost-effectiveness thresholds. In case pharmacogenetics, we it can often optimal test treatment, particularly if proportion nonresponders high, there potential serious adverse reactions, inexpensive. Genetic testing fragments population could reduce incentives R&D unless prices adjusted reflect expected targeted per patient. Even situations where adjusted, populations make viable. problem with analogous associated require similar remedies society values treatments these diseases.

参考文章(8)
J. Randal, Randomized controlled trials mark a golden anniversary. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. ,vol. 91, pp. 10- 12 ,(1999) , 10.1093/JNCI/91.1.10
Paul A. Martin, Sandra M. Thomas, THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF GENE THERAPY IN EUROPE AND THE USA Human Gene Therapy. ,vol. 9, pp. 87- 114 ,(1998) , 10.1089/HUM.1998.9.1-87
Kevin R. Lynch, Gary P. O'Neill, Qingyun Liu, Dong-Soon Im, Nicole Sawyer, Kathleen M. Metters, Nathalie Coulombe, Mark Abramovitz, David J. Figueroa, Zhizhen Zeng, Brett M. Connolly, Chang Bai, Christopher P. Austin, Anne Chateauneuf, Rino Stocco, Gillian M. Greig, Stacia Kargman, Shelley B. Hooks, Elizabeth Hosfield, David L. Williams, Anthony W. Ford-Hutchinson, C. Thomas Caskey, Jilly F. Evans, Characterization of the human cysteinyl leukotriene CysLT1 receptor. Nature. ,vol. 399, pp. 789- 793 ,(1999) , 10.1038/21658
C. McNeil, How Should HER2 Status Be Determined Journal of the National Cancer Institute. ,vol. 91, pp. 111- 111 ,(1999) , 10.1093/JNCI/91.2.111
Julia C. lezzoni, Stacey E. Mills, Timothy J. Pelkey, Mark H. Stoler, Inhibin Is Not an Immunohistochemical Marker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Example of the Potential Pitfall in Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry Caused by Endogenous Biotin American Journal of Clinical Pathology. ,vol. 111, pp. 229- 234 ,(1999) , 10.1093/AJCP/111.2.229
Jan Albert Kuivenhoven, J. Wouter Jukema, Aeilko H. Zwinderman, Peter de Knijff, Ruth McPherson, Albert V.G. Bruschke, Kong I. Lie, John J.P. Kastelein, The Role of a Common Variant of the Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Gene in the Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 338, pp. 86- 93 ,(1998) , 10.1056/NEJM199801083380203
James L. Wisecarver, HER-2/neu testing comes of age. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. ,vol. 111, pp. 299- 301 ,(1999) , 10.1093/AJCP/111.3.299
Dosne Pasqualini C, The human genome Medicina-buenos Aires. ,vol. 61, pp. 243- ,(2001)