Benefits and barriers among volunteer teaching faculty: comparison between those who precept and those who do not in the core pediatrics clerkship.

作者: Michael S. Ryan , Allison A. Vanderbilt , Thasia W. Lewis , Molly A. Madden

DOI: 10.3402/MEO.V18I0.20733

关键词:

摘要: Background: Community-based outpatient experiences are a core component of the clinical years in medical school. Central to success this experience is recruitment and retention volunteer faculty from community. Prior studies have identified reasons why some preceptors their time however, there paucity data comparing those who do not. Methods: A survey was developed following review previous addressing perceptions community-based preceptors. non-parametric, Mann–Whitney U test used compare active (APs) inactive (IPs) all were analyzed SPSS 20.0. Results: There 28% response rate. Preceptors showed similar demographic characteristics, valued intrinsic over extrinsic benefits, appreciated Continuing Medical Education (CME)/Maintenance Certification (MOC) opportunities as highest reward. APs more likely also precept at M1/M2 level value recognition development ( p <0.05). IPs denoted most significant barrier and, comparison APs, rated financial compensation important Conclusions: Community motivated by benefits teaching. Efforts recruit should initially focus on promoting awareness teaching offering CME/MOC opportunities. Increasing pool may require compensation. Keywords: preceptor; pediatric; community; pediatric clerkship; undergraduate education (Published: 3 May 2013) Citation: Med Educ Online 2013, 18 : 20733 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.20733

参考文章(29)
Wang-Cheng R, Fulkerson Pk, Community-based faculty: motivation and rewards. Family Medicine. ,vol. 29, pp. 105- 107 ,(1997)
Thomas B Lacroix, Meeting the need to train more doctors: The role of community-based preceptors. Paediatrics and Child Health. ,vol. 10, pp. 591- 594 ,(2005) , 10.1093/PCH/10.10.591
Cohen Jj, Whitcomb Me, Are the recommendations of the AAMC's task force on the generalist physician still valid? Academic Medicine. ,vol. 72, pp. 13- 16 ,(1997)
Arnold Jaffe, Peg Boyle Single, Robert Schwartz, Evaluating Programs for Recruiting and Retaining Community Faculty. Family Medicine. ,vol. 31, pp. 114- ,(1999)
Albert P. Scheiner, Guidelines for Medical Student Education in Community-Based Pediatric Offices Pediatrics. ,vol. 93, pp. 956- 959 ,(1994)
S. J. Slavin, M. S. Wilkes, C. S. Hodgson, D. W. Whitman, E. T. Marshall, Richard P. Usatine, Reactions of family medicine community preceptors to teaching medical students Family Medicine. ,vol. 27, pp. 566- 570 ,(1995)
Donald O Kollisch, Pamela York Fraiser, Lisa Slatt, Marie Storaasli, Community preceptors' views of a required third-year family medicine clerkship Archives of Family Medicine. ,vol. 6, pp. 25- 28 ,(1997) , 10.1001/ARCHFAMI.6.1.25
Arianne Teherani, Bridget C. OʼBrien, Dylan E. Masters, Ann N. Poncelet, Patricia A. Robertson, Karen E. Hauer, Burden, Responsibility, and Reward: Preceptor Experiences With the Continuity of Teaching in a Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship Academic Medicine. ,vol. 84, pp. S50- S53 ,(2009) , 10.1097/ACM.0B013E3181B38B01
Ashir Kumar, Dave Loomba, Rohit Y. Rahangdale, David J. Kallen, Rewards and incentives for nonsalaried clinical faculty who teach medical students Journal of General Internal Medicine. ,vol. 14, pp. 370- 372 ,(1999) , 10.1046/J.1525-1497.1999.00341.X
M R Greenlick, Educating physicians for the twenty-first century Academic Medicine. ,vol. 70, pp. 179- 185 ,(1995) , 10.1097/00001888-199503000-00007