Property Rights and Natural Resources: Socio-Economic Heterogeneity and Distributional Implications of Common Property Resource Management

作者: Bhim Adhikari

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Poverty, property rights and distributional implications of community-based resource management have become major topics discussion debate in recent years. This study tries to examine the contribution community forestry household-level income with particular emphasis on group heterogeneity equity benefit distribution. The assessment household level benefits suggests that poorer households are currently benefiting less absolute terms from than poor households. makes a number recommendations improve forest Nepal, which include, due consideration for needs selecting species forestry, transferability user rights, would allow endowed more, more equitable representation women disadvantaged groups committees. [SANDEE WP 1]

参考文章(97)
J. K. Jackson, Manual of afforestation in Nepal. Manual of afforestation in Nepal.. ,(1987)
N. S. Jodha, Rural common property resources: contributions and crisis. Economic and Political Weekly. ,vol. 25, ,(1990)
Michael Chibnik, The Value of Subsistence Production Journal of Anthropological Research. ,vol. 34, pp. 561- 576 ,(1978) , 10.1086/JAR.34.4.3629650
Nirmal Singh, R. P. Singh, Karam Singh, Utilisation and development of common property resources - a field study in Punjab. Indian journal of agricultural economics. ,vol. 51, pp. 249- 259 ,(1996)
Elvira. Graner, The political ecology of community forestry in Nepal Verlag für Entwicklungspolitik. ,(1997)
Jean François Dobremez, Le Népal : écologie et biogéographie Éditions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique. ,(1976)
T. Beck, Excluding the poor from their rights : the case of natural resources in West Bengal University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CA. ,(1998)