No species barrier by call in an avian hybrid zone between California and Gambel's quail (Callipepla californica and C. gambelii)

作者: JENNIFER M. GEE

DOI: 10.1111/J.1095-8312.2005.00538.X

关键词:

摘要: Acoustic signals sometimes act as premating isolating barriers between animal species, but we know little about the circumstances that dictate presence and strength of these barriers. Among insects, to backcrossing are strengthened by acoustic under genetic control. Hybrid tend be intermediate parental signals, recognized only like-types, which results in reinforced species boundaries. This is not typically case avian taxa. Instead, signal transmission controlled some combination genes learning, perhaps a consequence this variation, vocalizations play diversity roles hybrid zones. I used California Gambel's quail (Callipepla californica C. gambelii), hybridizing birds do learn vocalize, explore whether genetically determined function barrier. Using spectral analysis, measured temporal features calls uniquely colour-banded were recorded across one area zone. Species discrimination known occur captive conditions, though its basis unexplored. Here show differences likely great enough permit discrimination. call components those covaried with traits, assessed seven highly polymorphic microsatellite loci. Contrary expectation, males frequently called response unlike- like-type females who had initiated antiphonal calling, courtship female male. Furthermore, paired did share assembly calls, nor was there correlation female's or plumage traits her mate's advertisement call. Based on results, conclude recognize each other hybrids potential mates occurs frequently. Thus, compatible mating could contribute increased mixing gene pools slow rate speciation. suggest selection respond wide variation within imprinting mixed-species coveys may cause compatibility classes hybridization. © 2005 The Linnean Society London, Biological Journal Society, 2005, 86, 253–264.

参考文章(63)
Robert B. Payne, Bird Songs and Avian Systematics Current Ornithology. pp. 87- 126 ,(1986) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-6784-4_2
Klaus Immelmann, Sexual and Other Long-Term Aspects of Imprinting in Birds and Other Species Advances in The Study of Behavior. ,vol. 4, pp. 147- 174 ,(1972) , 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60009-1
Brian I. Crother, Daniel R. Brooks, Deborah A. McLennan, Phylogeny, Ecology, and Behavior. A Research Program in Comparative Biology Copeia. ,vol. 1991, pp. 1151- ,(1991) , 10.2307/1446122
Keith M. Kendrick, Michael R. Hinton, Khia Atkins, Martin A. Haupt, John D. Skinner, Mothers determine sexual preferences Nature. ,vol. 395, pp. 229- 230 ,(1998) , 10.1038/26129
J Haavie, T Borge, S Bures, László Zsolt Garamszegi, HM Lampe, J Moreno, Anna Qvarnström, János Török, G‐P Sætre, Flycatcher song in allopatry and sympatry – convergence, divergence and reinforcement Journal of Evolutionary Biology. ,vol. 17, pp. 227- 237 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1420-9101.2003.00682.X
J. SECONDI, V. BRETAGNOLLE, C. COMPAGNON, B. FAIVRE, Species-specific song convergence in a moving hybrid zone between two passerines Biological Journal of The Linnean Society. ,vol. 80, pp. 507- 517 ,(2003) , 10.1046/J.1095-8312.2003.00248.X
Tore Slagsvold, Bo T. Hansen, Lars E. Johannessen, Jan T. Lifjeld, Mate choice and imprinting in birds studied by cross-fostering in the wild Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. ,vol. 269, pp. 1449- 1455 ,(2002) , 10.1098/RSPB.2002.2045
Nigel Mann, Dave R. Vos, Carel Ten Cate, Sexual imprinting and song learning: Two of one kind? Netherlands Journal of Zoology. ,vol. 43, pp. 34- 45 ,(1992) , 10.1163/156854293X00197
Peter R. Grant, B. Rosemary Grant, Hybridization, Sexual Imprinting, and Mate Choice The American Naturalist. ,vol. 149, pp. 1- 28 ,(1997) , 10.1086/285976
LAURA BEANI, FRANCESCO DESSÌ-FULGHERI, Mate choice in the grey partridge,Perdix perdix: role of physical and behavioural male traits Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 49, pp. 347- 356 ,(1995) , 10.1006/ANBE.1995.0047