Recommended Internet Service Provider Security Services and Procedures Status of this Memo This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

作者: T. Killalea

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: The purpose of this document is to express what the engineering community as represented by IETF expects Internet Service Providers (ISPs) with respect security. It not intent define a set requirements that would be appropriate for all ISPs, but rather raise awareness among ISPs community’s expectations, and provide framework discussion security expectations current prospective service providers.

参考文章(16)
Y. Rekhter, Address Allocation for Private Internets RFC. ,vol. 1597, pp. 1- 8 ,(1994)
E. Gerich, T. Bates, L. Joncheray, J.-M. Jouanigot, J. Yu, D. Karrenberg, M. Terpstra, Representation of IP Routing Policies in a Routing Registry (ripe-81++) RFC. ,vol. 1786, pp. 1- 83 ,(1995)
J. Myers, SMTP Service Extension for Authentication RFC. ,vol. 2554, pp. 1- 11 ,(1999)
Barbara Fraser, None, Site Security Handbook RFC. ,vol. 2196, pp. 1- 75 ,(1997)
N. Brownlee, E. Guttman, Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response RFC. ,vol. 2350, pp. 1- 38 ,(1998)
R. Chandra, C. Villamizar, R. Govindan, BGP Route Flap Damping BGP Route Flap Damping. ,vol. 2439, pp. 1- 37 ,(1998)
D. Crocker, Mailbox Names for Common Services, Roles and Functions RFC. ,vol. 2142, pp. 1- 6 ,(1997)
R. Schoultz, C. Weider, P. Faltstrom, P. Deutsch, Architecture of the WHOIS++ service RFC. ,vol. 1835, pp. 1- 41 ,(1995)
S. Bradner, Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels RFC. ,vol. 2119, pp. 1- 3 ,(1997)
A. Heffernan, Protection of BGP Sessions via the TCP MD5 Signature Option RFC. ,vol. 2385, pp. 1- 6 ,(1998)