Bare market: campus sex ratios, romantic relationships, and sexual behavior.

作者: Jeremy E. Uecker , Mark D. Regnerus

DOI: 10.1111/J.1533-8525.2010.01177.X

关键词:

摘要: Using a nationally representative sample of college women, we evaluate the effect campus sex ratios on women's relationship attitudes and behaviors. Our results suggest that women campuses where they comprise higher proportion student body give more negative appraisals men relationships, go fewer traditional dates, are less likely to have had boyfriend, be sexually active. These effects appear stem both from decreased dyadic power among numerous their increased difficulty locating partner such campuses.

参考文章(57)
Nigel Barber, Mustache Fashion Covaries with a Good Marriage Market for Women Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. ,vol. 25, pp. 261- 272 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1012515505895
Nigel Barber, Women's Dress Fashions as a Function of Reproductive Strategy Sex Roles. ,vol. 40, pp. 459- 471 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1018823727012
Norval Glenn, Elizabeth Marquardt, Hooking up, Hanging out, and Hoping for Mr. Right: College Women on Dating and Mating Today. Institute for American Values, 1841 Broadway, Suite 211, New York, NY 10023 ($10). Tel: 212-246-3942; Fax: 212-541-6665; e-mail: info@americanvalues.org; Web site: http://www.americanvalues.org.. ,(2001)
Edward O. Laumann, Stephen Ellingson, Jenna Mahay, Anthony Paik, Yoosik Youm, The sexual organization of the city University of Chicago Press. ,(2004) , 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226470337.001.0001
Tom Wolfe, I Am Charlotte Simmons ,(2004)
William Fielding Ogburn, Ernest R. Groves, American Marriage and Family Relationships ,(1976)
Pamela C. Regan, Carla S. Dreyer, Lust? Love? Status?: Young Adults' Motives for Engaging in Casual Sex Journal of psychology & human sexuality. ,vol. 11, pp. 1- 24 ,(1999) , 10.1300/J056V11N01_01
Gary Stanley Becker, The Economic Approach to Human Behavior ,(1976)
Daniel T. Lichter, Diane K. McLaughlin, George Kephart, David J. Landry, Race and the Retreat From Marriage: A Shortage of Marriageable Men? American Sociological Review. ,vol. 57, pp. 781- ,(1992) , 10.2307/2096123