Podemos evitar la perfección del condicional enfocando el antecedente o son necesarios antecedentes alternativos

作者: Miguel López

DOI: 10.4067/S0718-09342014000200006

关键词:

摘要: espanolFarr (2011) argumenta que la perfeccion del condicional se produce en escenarios con un enfoque el antecedente de condicional, y no cuando centra consecuente una expresion tal indole. Este planteamiento parece contradecir tesis implicatura escalar conversacional, supone que, para suceda, es necesario los condicionales cuenten antecedentes alternativos sus consecuentes. En este trabajo, revisamos labor experimental realizada por Farr defendemos metodologia emplea su investigacion mas apropiada apoyar supuestos, ya presenta ciertos problemas provocan conclusiones sean discutibles, tanto, podemos seguir aceptando conversacional. Igualmente, insiste fenomeno puede explicar comenten frecuentemente ciertas falacias EnglishFarr argues that conditional perfection occurs in scenarios with a focus on the antecedent of statement, and not when is consequent statement such nature. This approach seems to contradict thesis scalar conversational implicature theory which sustains thatfor happen, it necessary for statements have alternative antecedents their consequents. In this paper, I analyze work by argue methodology used her research appropriate support assumptions, as presents some problems cause conclusions be questionable. We can continue accept implicature. Similarly, special emphasis given idea phenomenon explain why certain fallacies are frequently committed

参考文章(23)
Miguel López Astorga, Razonamiento contrafactual y conocimiento general. La primacía de la estructura formal abstracta en el autismo. Revista de Educación Inclusiva. ,vol. 4, pp. 121- 134 ,(2011)
Andrei Moldovan, Pragmatic Considerations in the Interpretation of Denying the Antecedent Informal Logic. ,vol. 29, pp. 309- 326 ,(2009) , 10.22329/IL.V29I3.2846
Fiona J. Scott, Simon Baron-Cohen, Alan Leslie, ‘If pigs could fly’: A test of counterfactual reasoning and pretence in children with autism British Journal of Development Psychology. ,vol. 17, pp. 349- 362 ,(1999) , 10.1348/026151099165339
Rebecca McKenzie, Jonathan St. B. T. Evans, Simon J. Handley, Conditional reasoning in autism: activation and integration of knowledge and belief. Developmental Psychology. ,vol. 46, pp. 391- 403 ,(2010) , 10.1037/A0017412
Laurence R. Horn, From if to iff: Conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening Journal of Pragmatics. ,vol. 32, pp. 289- 326 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00053-3
P. C. Wason, Reasoning about a rule Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 20, pp. 273- 281 ,(1968) , 10.1080/14640746808400161
Johan van der Auwera, Pragmatics in the last quarter century: The case of conditional perfection☆ Journal of Pragmatics. ,vol. 27, pp. 261- 274 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00058-6
Vittorio Girotto, Katya Tentori, Is domain-general thinking a domain-specific adaptation? Mind & Society. ,vol. 7, pp. 167- 175 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S11299-007-0045-3