Pragmatic Considerations in the Interpretation of Denying the Antecedent
作者： Andrei Moldovan
关键词:
摘要: In this paper I am concerned with the analysis of fragments a discourse or text that express arguments suspected being denials antecedent. first argue one needs to distinguish between two senses ‘the argument expressed’. Second, show that, respect these senses, given Gricean account pragmatics conditionals, some such systematically are valid.
core.ac.uk
sci-hub.st 参考文章(18)
Kent Bach, The top 10 misconceptions about implicature John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 21- 30 ,(2006)
Jonathan Eric Adler, Belief's Own Ethics ,(2002)
Christopher W. Tindale, Fallacies and Argument Appraisal ,(2007)
Erik C. W. Krabbe, The Pragmatics of Deductive Arguments Informal Logic at 25: Proceedings of the Windsor Conference. ,(2004)
David Godden, Douglas Walton, Denying the Antecedent as a Legitimate Argumentative Strategy: A Dialectical Model Informal Logic. ,vol. 24, ,(2004) , 10.22329/IL.V24I3.2146
Michael B. Burke, Denying the Antecedent: A Common Fallacy? Informal Logic. ,vol. 16, ,(1994) , 10.22329/IL.V16I1.2432
Jennifer M. Saul, Speaker Meaning, What is Said, and What is Implicated Noûs. ,vol. 36, pp. 228- 248 ,(2002) , 10.1111/1468-0068.00369
Laurence R. Horn, From if to iff: Conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening Journal of Pragmatics. ,vol. 32, pp. 289- 326 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00053-3
Johan van der Auwera, Pragmatics in the last quarter century: The case of conditional perfection☆ Journal of Pragmatics. ,vol. 27, pp. 261- 274 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00058-6
Stephen Neale, Paul Grice and the philosophy of language Linguistics and Philosophy. ,vol. 15, pp. 509- 559 ,(1992) , 10.1007/BF00630629