The Psychological Basis of Quality Decision Making

作者: Charlan Jeanne Nemeth

DOI: 10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_510-1

关键词:

摘要: Author(s): Nemeth, Charlan Jeanne | Abstract: Effective strategic management requires analysis, decisions and actions by an organization to create sustain competitive advantage. Gooddecisions are obviously desirable but whether the decision is good a judgment call, often after fact, itself subject bias. What less debate process that leads accuracy or quality making. This not just access available information proper processing, interpretation integration of data. Critical consideration multiple options perspectives at all stages there myriad reasons why people do that. Defective come from poor search, selective bias in processing information, lack considering alternatives, failure examine risks preferred choice rush (Janis Mann 1977). In short, selection, “biased”. this brief overview, we consider “bias” both individual group level. The overarching perspective psychological constrain thought also antidotes can improve it. former more numerous well documented than latter making, influences predictable, pervasive profound, leading times defective making other better even creative

参考文章(14)
Paul Slovic, Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, Judgment under uncertainty: Causality and attribution ,(1982) , 10.1017/CBO9780511809477
Charlan Jeanne Nemeth, Minority Influence Theory Institute for Research on Labor and Employment. ,(2010)
Leon Festinger, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance ,(1957)
P. C. Wason, On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 12, pp. 129- 140 ,(1960) , 10.1080/17470216008416717
Irving Lester Janis, Victims of groupthink : a psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes Published in <b>1972</b> in Boston by Houghton Mifflin. ,(1972)