Interactions between Ecological Traits and Host Plant Type Explain Distribution Change in Noctuid Moths

作者: NIINA MATTILA , JANNE S. KOTIAHO , VEIJO KAITALA , ATTE KOMONEN , JUSSI PÄIVINEN

DOI: 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2008.01138.X

关键词:

摘要: The ecological traits of species determine how well a can withstand threats to which it is exposed. If these predisposing be identified, that are most at risk decline identified and an understanding the processes behind declines gained. We sought body size, specificity larval host plant, overwintering stage, type interactions related distribution change in noctuid moths. used data derived from literature analyzed effects both separately simultaneously same model. When we separately, seemed important determinants were stage plant. Nevertheless, often correlated independent effect each trait may not seen analyses separately. accounted for other traits, results substantially different. Only one (body size), but 3 interactions, explained change. This finding suggests determined by 1 or 2 traits; rather, depends on interacting traits. Such complexity makes difficult understand changes emphasizes need basic knowledge species. With such knowledge, more accurate picture factors causing increasing extinction might attainable.

参考文章(23)
Roger LH Dennis, Tim H Sparks, Peter B Hardy, Bias in Butterfly Distribution Maps: The Effects of Sampling Effort Journal of Insect Conservation. ,vol. 3, pp. 33- 42 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1009678422145
Mark D. Pagel, Paul H. Harvey, The comparative method in evolutionary biology ,(1991)
NIINA MATTILA, VEIJO KAITALA, ATTE KOMONEN, JANNE S. KOTIAHO, JUSSI PÄIVINEN, Ecological Determinants of Distribution Decline and Risk of Extinction in Moths Conservation Biology. ,vol. 20, pp. 1161- 1168 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2006.00404.X
M. S. Warren, J. K. Hill, J. A. Thomas, J. Asher, R. Fox, B. Huntley, D. B. Roy, M. G. Telfer, S. Jeffcoate, P. Harding, G. Jeffcoate, S. G. Willis, J. N. Greatorex-Davies, D. Moss, C. D. Thomas, Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature. ,vol. 414, pp. 65- 69 ,(2001) , 10.1038/35102054
Marcel Cardillo, Andy Purvis, Wes Sechrest, John L Gittleman, Jon Bielby, Georgina M Mace, Human Population Density and Extinction Risk in the World's Carnivores PLoS Biology. ,vol. 2, pp. e197- ,(2004) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.0020197
Tarmo Virtanen, Seppo Neuvonen, Climate change and macrolepidopteran biodiversity in Finland Chemosphere - Global Change Science. ,vol. 1, pp. 439- 448 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S1465-9972(99)00039-2
T. J. Yates, M. G. Morris, E. Pollard, Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation ,(1993)
Kelvin F. Conrad, Ian P. Woiwod, Mark Parsons, Richard Fox, Martin S. Warren, Long-term population trends in widespread British moths Journal of Insect Conservation. ,vol. 8, pp. 119- 136 ,(2004) , 10.1023/B:JICO.0000045810.36433.C6
P. A. Hamback, K. S. Summerville, I. Steffan-Dewenter, J. Krauss, G. Englund, T. O. Crist, Habitat specialization, body size, and family identity explain lepidopteran density–area relationships in a cross-continental comparison Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 104, pp. 8368- 8373 ,(2007) , 10.1073/PNAS.0611462104
J. Lindström, L. Kaila, P. Niemelä, Polyphagy and adult body size in geometrid moths. Oecologia. ,vol. 98, pp. 130- 132 ,(1994) , 10.1007/BF00341463