On the dynamics of national scientific systems: a reply

摘要: The comments of Everett (2011) and Light Moody confirm our sense that, as a part studying the dynamics scientific change, we are tackling an interesting important set problems by using wonderful data set. We appreciate their constructive critiques, especially prompts to look more closely at have. Their also make it clear that greatly indebted people Institute Information Science in Maribor (IZUM) for maintenance Current Research System (SICRIS) Cooperative Online Bibliometric Services (COBISS) archives. Without these sets could not study total disciplinary networks within Slovene national science system. privileged having access data. agree with about value comparing this system other such systems. However, do know one hope efforts help promote idea creating comparable nations. They may, indeed, exist and, if so, would be than willing share ideas researchers elsewhere regarding attention how created is merited, regard many decisions must made designing them. Some explicitly while others implicitly. some features results report paper Kronegger et al. (2011), henceforth KFD, differ somewhat from those both Newman (2004) because wider framework used IZUM including information. think research program enhanced expansive inclusion types productions. This particularly valuable