Reforming Again, Again, and Again

作者: Larry Cuban

DOI: 10.3102/0013189X019001003

关键词:

摘要: Why do reforms return again and again? To illustrate that the question is valid, I offer three examples drawn from instructional, curricular, governance planned changes have returned more than once. answer question, first examine dominant explanation presented by researchers policymakers: lack of rationality in proposing implementing change. explore why flawed its frequently used metaphors analysis. then alternative explanations for recurring reforms—a political an institutional perspective harnessed together—to explain puzzle return. The point this analysis to enlarge repertoire policymakers use potential past reforms. policymaking stakes run high expanding range because questions failed they go heart present policy debates over whether federal, state, ...

参考文章(83)
Robert E. Slavin, PET and the Pendulum: Faddism in Education and how to Stop It. Phi Delta Kappan. ,vol. 70, ,(1989)
David T. Kearns, An Education Recovery Plan for America. Phi Delta Kappan. ,vol. 69, ,(1988)
Thomas James, David Tyack, Learning from Past Efforts to Reform the High School. Phi Delta Kappan. ,vol. 64, ,(1983)
William L. Boyd, Charles T. Kerchner, The Politics of excellence and choice in education Falmer. ,(1988)
Edward A. Krug, Charles W. Eliot and popular education Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University. ,(1961)