Selective Contracts, Foreclosure, and the Chicago School View*

作者: Christodoulos Stefanadis

DOI: 10.1086/467396

关键词:

摘要: Abstract I examine a mechanism by which exclusive supply contracts may inefficiently deter entry into the market. In model, incumbent supplier selectively offers only to some buyers and convinces them consent guaranteeing low prices. The strengthen monopoly position of allow it extract rents from remaining that were not offered contracts. Aside favorable contract terms, have another reason exclusivity scheme: latter raises input costs rival model has potential applications recent Microsoft antitrust case (1994). define as an agreement under upstream firm becomes downstream firm; is prohibited buying other suppliers.

参考文章(17)
Robert J. Levinson, Efficiency Lost?: The Microsoft Consent Decree Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 175- 194 ,(1996) , 10.1007/978-1-4613-1397-7_9
Jeffrey M. Perloff, Dennis W. Carlton, Modern Industrial Organization ,(1990)
Marius Schwartz, The Competitive Effects of Vertical Agreements: Comment The American Economic Review. ,vol. 77, pp. 1063- 1068 ,(2016)
Robert Innes, Richard Sexton, Strategic buyers and exclusionary contracts The American Economic Review. ,vol. 84, pp. 566- 584 ,(1994)
David Scheffman, Richard S. Higgins, Raising Rivals’ Costs Oxford Handbooks Online. ,vol. 73, pp. 267- 271 ,(2014) , 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199388592.013.0003
Ralph A. Winter, G. Frank Mathewson, The Competitive Effects of Vertical Agreements: Comment The American Economic Review. ,vol. 77, pp. 1057- 1062 ,(2016)
William S. Comanor, H. E. Frech, The Competitive Effects of Vertical Agreements The American Economic Review. ,vol. 75, pp. 539- 546 ,(2016)
Christodoulos Stefanadis, Sunk Costs, Contestability, and the Latent Contract Market Journal of Economics and Management Strategy. ,vol. 12, pp. 119- 138 ,(2003) , 10.1111/J.1430-9134.2003.00119.X
Kathryn E. Spier, Michael D. Whinston, On the Efficiency of Privately Stipulated Damages for Breach of Contract: Entry Barriers, Reliance, and Renegotiation The RAND Journal of Economics. ,vol. 26, pp. 180- 202 ,(1995) , 10.2307/2555912