Finite element simulation of springback for a channel draw process with drawbead using different hardening models

作者: Aboozar Taherizadeh , Abbas Ghaei , Daniel E. Green , William J. Altenhof

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJMECSCI.2009.03.001

关键词:

摘要: Abstract The objective of this work is to predict the springback Numisheet’05 Benchmark#3 with different material models using commercial finite element code ABAQUS. This Benchmark consisted drawing straight channel sections sheet materials and four drawbead penetrations. Numerical simulations were performed Hill's 1948 anisotropic yield function two types hardening models: isotropic (IH) combined isotropic-nonlinear kinematic (NKH). A user-defined subroutine was developed based on quadratic mixed for both ABAQUS-Explicit (VUMAT) ABAQUS-Standard (UMAT). behavior AA6022-T43 aluminum alloy described Voce model that DP600, HSLA AKDQ steels Hollomon's power law. Kinematic modeled Armstrong–Frederick nonlinear purpose accounting cyclic deformation phenomena such as Bauschinger effect stress saturation which are important prediction. penetration or restraining force has also been studied. Experimental shear tests carried out in order determine stress–strain behavior. Comparisons between simulation results experimental data showed IH generally overestimated predicted amount due higher stresses derived by model. On other hand, NKH able significantly more accurately than

参考文章(37)
B. S. Levy, C. J. Van Tyne, Y. H. Moon, C. Mikalsen, The Effective Unloading Modulus for Automotive Sheet Steels SAE Technical Paper Series. ,(2006) , 10.4271/2006-01-0146
Daniel E. Green, Description of Numisheet 2005 Benchmark ♯3 Stage‐1: Channel Draw with 75% drawbead penetration NUMISHEET 2005: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Process. ,vol. 778, pp. 894- 904 ,(2005) , 10.1063/1.2011335
Ming F. Shi, Specification For Benchmark Materials NUMISHEET 2005: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Process. ,vol. 778, pp. 1173- 1178 ,(2005) , 10.1063/1.2011345
Thomas B. Stoughton, Specification For BM3: Two‐Stage Channel/Cup Draw NUMISHEET 2005: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Process. ,vol. 778, pp. 1157- 1172 ,(2005) , 10.1063/1.2011344
K. M. Zhao, J. K. Lee, Generation of Cyclic Stress-Strain Curves for Sheet Metals Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology-transactions of The Asme. ,vol. 123, pp. 391- 397 ,(2001) , 10.1115/1.1395021
S. Thuillier, P.Y. Manach, Comparison of the work-hardening of metallic sheets using tensile and shear strain paths International Journal of Plasticity. ,vol. 25, pp. 733- 751 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.IJPLAS.2008.07.002
M OLIVEIRA, J ALVES, B CHAPARRO, L MENEZES, Study on the influence of work-hardening modeling in springback prediction International Journal of Plasticity. ,vol. 23, pp. 516- 543 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.IJPLAS.2006.07.003
F. Pourboghrat, S.-H. Choi, E. Chu, F. Barlat, J.C. Brem, J.W. Yoon, K. Chung, R.E. Dick, D.J. Lege, Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets—part 1: theory International Journal of Plasticity. ,vol. 19, pp. 1297- 1319 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0
F. Barlat, Y. Maeda, K. Chung, M. Yanagawa, J.C. Brem, Y. Hayashida, D.J. Lege, K. Matsui, S.J. Murtha, S. Hattori, R.C. Becker, S. Makosey, Yield function development for aluminum alloy sheets Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids. ,vol. 45, pp. 1727- 1763 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00034-3
Jenn-Terng Gau, Gary L Kinzel, An experimental investigation of the influence of the Bauschinger effect on springback predictions Journal of Materials Processing Technology. ,vol. 108, pp. 369- 375 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00834-7