Open vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-controlled study assessing short-term outcome.
作者： Matti V. Kairaluoma , Mikko T. Viljakka , Ilmo H. Kellokumpu
DOI: 10.1007/S10350-004-6555-8
关键词:
摘要: PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic repair for rectal prolapse. METHODS: A case-control undertaken. The case group consisted a consecutive series patients who underwent prolapse between February 1993 June 2000. control open October 1987 January RESULTS: There were 53 in each group. groups matched according operation type, gender, age. Median operative time longer than (resection rectopexy 210 vs. 117 minutes, 127.5 72 respectively). postoperative hospital stay shorter 5 7 days, 4.5 intraoperative bleeding minor 35 300 ml, 15 100 Mortality (0 4 percent), complications (23 30 late (4 13 rate recurrent (6 percent) did not differ significantly groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic is technically feasible can be performed with mortality morbidity rates comparable those conventional technique. main advantages approach appear lessened blood loss. Recurrence increased short term.
springer.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(48)
J C Lauder, F W Poon, M A Aitchison, I G Finlay, R F McKee, A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surgery gynecology & obstetrics. ,vol. 174, pp. 145- 148 ,(1992)
I. H. Kellokumpu, J. Vironen, T. Scheinin, Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse: a prospective study evaluating surgical outcome and changes in symptoms and bowel function. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. ,vol. 14, pp. 634- 640 ,(2000) , 10.1007/S004640000017
Amanda M. Metcalf, Sidney F. Phillips, Alan R. Zinsmeister, Robert L. MacCarty, Robert W. Beart, Bruce G. Wolff, Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit Gastroenterology. ,vol. 92, pp. 40- 47 ,(1987) , 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90837-7
P Sainio, A Husa, K von Smitten, Abdominal rectopexy and sigmoid resection (Frykman-Goldberg operation) for rectal prolapse Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. ,vol. 154, pp. 221- 224 ,(1988)
F. T. Huber, H. Stein, J. R. Siewert, Functional results after treatment of rectal prolapse with rectopexy and sigmoid resection. World Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 19, pp. 138- 143 ,(1995) , 10.1007/BF00316999
A. Cuschieri, Adverse cardiovascular changes induced by positive pressure pneumoperitoneum Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. ,vol. 12, pp. 93- 94 ,(1998) , 10.1007/S004649900604
A. M. Cuthbertson, J. A. Smith, An abdominal repair for complete rectal prolapse. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 58, pp. 499- 503 ,(1988) , 10.1111/J.1445-2197.1988.TB06243.X
S. M. Heah, J. E. Hartley, J. Hurley, G. S. Duthie, J. R. T. Monson, Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is effective treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 43, pp. 638- 643 ,(2000) , 10.1007/BF02235579
Milton H. Goldrath, Eduardo Phillips, A method of closing laparoscopy port incisions using a modified Veress needle The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. ,vol. 3, pp. 287- 290 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S1074-3804(96)80015-6
A. C. Poen, M. de Brauw, R. J. F. Felt-Bersma, D. de Jong, M. A. Cuesta, Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Clinical outcome and anorectal function tests. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. ,vol. 10, pp. 904- 908 ,(1996) , 10.1007/BF00188480