Comparative treatment planning in radiotherapy and clinical impact of proton relative biological effectiveness.

作者: Jonas Johansson

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Currently, most clinical range-modulated proton beams are assumed to have a fixed overall relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1. However, it is well known that the RBE increases with depth in spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) and becomes about 10% higher than mid-SOBP at 2 mm from distal edge (Paganetti 2003 Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 413-26) can reach values 1.3-1.4 vitro (Robertson et al 1975 35 1664-77, Courdi 1994 Br. J. Radiol. 67 800-4). We present fast method for applying variable correction linear energy transfer (LET) dependent tissue-specific parameters based on alpharef/betaref ratios suitable implementation treatment planning system. The influence this multiple beam dose plan presented here. evaluated by weighted volume histograms (DVHs) calculation tumour control probability (TCP) normal tissue complication (NTCP) values. yields DVHs target volumes (CTVs), primary advanced hypopharynx cancer subclinical disease lymph nodes, slightly those achieved multiplying absorbed RBE=1.1. Although, more importantly, DVH an organ risk, spinal cord considerably increased RBE. As particular case located 8 behind (PTV) hence receives only low total doses, NTCP zero spite significant increase high non-target were obtained when correction. variations tend be smaller vivo systems, study-based data since human scarce large uncertainties-can interpreted as showing upper limits possible effects utilizing In conclusion, results here still indicate difference introducing compared generic 1.1, suggesting worth considering such therapy planning, especially risk organs immediately volume.

参考文章(218)
Daniela Schulz-Ertner, Anna Nikoghosyan, Christoph Thilmann, Thomas Haberer, Oliver Jäkel, Christian Karger, Michael Scholz, Gerhard Kraft, Michael Wannenmacher, Jürgen Debus, Carbon ion radiotherapy for chordomas and low-grade chondrosarcomas of the skull base. Results in 67 patients. Strahlentherapie Und Onkologie. ,vol. 179, pp. 598- 605 ,(2003) , 10.1007/S00066-003-1120-2
Börje Larsson, Borje Larsson, Radiological properties of beams of high-energy protons. Radiat. Res., Suppl. 7, 304-11(1967).. ,vol. 7, pp. 304- ,(1967) , 10.2307/3583724
Mirjam M.J Braaksma, Oda B Wijers, John R van Sörnsen de Koste, Henrie van der Est, Paul I.M Schmitz, Peter J.C.M Nowak, Peter C Levendag, Optimisation of conformal radiation therapy by intensity modulation Radiotherapy and Oncology. ,vol. 66, pp. 291- 302 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0167-8140(03)00038-0
William Henry Bragg, Studies in radioactivity ,(1912)
Torunn I Yock, Nancy J Tarbell, Technology insight: Proton beam radiotherapy for treatment in pediatric brain tumors. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 1, pp. 97- 103 ,(2004) , 10.1038/NCPONC0090
A.P. Brown, M.M. Urie, R. Chisin, H.D. Sui, Proton therapy for carcinoma of the nasopharynx: a study in comparative treatment planning. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 16, pp. 1607- 1614 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90970-X
David A. Bush, Jerry D. Slater, Reiner Bonnet, Gregory A. Cheek, Richard D. Dunbar, Michael Moyers, James M. Slater, Proton-Beam Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer Chest. ,vol. 116, pp. 1313- 1319 ,(1999) , 10.1378/CHEST.116.5.1313
Matthew B Parliament, Rufus A Scrimger, Stephanie G Anderson, Elizabeth C Kurien, Heather K Thompson, G.Colin Field, John Hanson, Preservation of oral health-related quality of life and salivary flow rates after inverse-planned intensity- modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 58, pp. 663- 673 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01571-2