Accuracy of a Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation Protocol for Orthognathic Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study

作者: Sam Sheng-Pin Hsu , Jaime Gateno , R. Bryan Bell , David L. Hirsch , Michael R. Markiewicz

DOI: 10.1016/J.JOMS.2012.03.027

关键词:

摘要: Purpose The purpose of this prospective multicenter study was to assess the accuracy a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol for orthognathic surgery. Materials and Methods CASS assessed by comparing planned outcomes with postoperative 65 consecutive patients enrolled from 3 centers. Computer-generated splints were used all patients. For genioplasty, 1 center computer-generated chin templates reposition segment only asymmetry. Standard intraoperative measurements without remaining primary outcome linear angular differences maxilla, mandible, when models registered at cranium. secondary maxillary dental midline difference between positions groups use template. latter measured mandibular body. Statistical analyses performed, reported using root mean square deviation (RMSD) Bland-Altman method assessing measurement agreement. Results In measurements, there no statistically significant among centers maxilla mandible. largest RMSDs 1.0 mm 1.5° 1.1 1.8° chin, template group showed excellent accuracy, positional RMSD orientation 2.2°. However, larger variances observed in not This anteroposterior superoinferior directions pitch yaw orientations. 0.9 mm. When body consistent results found measurements. Conclusions Using protocol, computerized plan can be transferred accurately consistently patient position mandible time provides greater repositioning than

参考文章(35)
Thiam-huat Tng, Validity of cephalometric landmarks 香港大學學位論文. ,(1991) , 10.5353/TH_B3862839
[edited by] William H. Bell, Caesar A. Guerrero, Distraction Osteogenesis of the Facial Skeleton ,(2006)
Sercan Akyalcin, Kate Litschel, Timo Peltomäki, Jeryl D. English, Mosby's Orthodontic Review ,(2008)
Severt Tr, Proffit Wr, The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina. The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. ,vol. 12, pp. 171- 176 ,(1997)
T. T. H. Tng, T. C. K. Chan, U. Hagg, M. S. Cooke, Validity of cephalometric landmarks. An experimental study on human skulls European Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 16, pp. 110- 120 ,(1994) , 10.1093/EJO/16.2.110
Gert Santler, 3-D COSMOS: a new 3-D model based computerised operation simulation and navigation system Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. ,vol. 28, pp. 287- 293 ,(2000) , 10.1054/JCMS.2000.0156
Gwen R.J. Swennen, Filip Schutyser, Enno-Ludwig Barth, Pieter De Groeve, Albert De Mey, A New Method of 3-D Cephalometry Part I: The Anatomic Cartesian 3-D Reference System Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. ,vol. 17, pp. 314- 325 ,(2006) , 10.1097/00001665-200603000-00019
R. Bryan Bell, Computer Planning and Intraoperative Navigation in Orthognathic Surgery Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. ,vol. 69, pp. 592- 605 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JOMS.2009.06.030
J. Martin Bland, DouglasG. Altman, Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet. ,vol. 327, pp. 307- 310 ,(1986) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
James J. Xia, Jaime Gateno, John F. Teichgraeber, New Clinical Protocol to Evaluate Craniomaxillofacial Deformity and Plan Surgical Correction Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. ,vol. 67, pp. 2093- 2106 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.JOMS.2009.04.057