Prevalence of pain in a university veterinary intensive care unit.

作者: Clara E. Moran , Erik H. Hofmeister

DOI: 10.1111/VEC.12010

关键词:

摘要: Objective The purposes of this study were to determine the prevalence pain in veterinary ICU patients, if there are predictors for patients be painful, and relate 3 commonly used scoring systems with each other. Design Cross-sectional observational study. Setting The was conducted small animal at University Georgia Veterinary teaching hospital. Animals All dogs admitted during June 1, 2010–August 5, 2010 eligible inclusion. Exclusion criteria included receiving supplemental oxygen, comatose animals, aggressive animals a zoonotic disease. Interventions None. Measurements Main Results Twice daily, randomly generated times, an independent observer assessed every dog using three different methods: Glasgow composite scale (Glasgow), visual analogue (VAS), simple descriptive (SDS). Six hundred twenty-nine observations made on 230 individual over 63-day time period. Dogs who hydromorphone or orthopedic neurosurgical service more likely described as painful. Overall, 22% not depending day week. There no difference slope between VAS scores order. The kappa statistic 0.58 SDS, 0.70 0.47 VAS. Conclusions In population, undergoing surgery needed intense analgesic approach ensure that they nonpainful. SDS identified highest number painful systems, given levels defining pain.

参考文章(13)
D Flaherty, E Welsh, L L Holton, E M Scott, A M Nolan, J Reid, Comparison of three methods used for assessment of pain in dogs. Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association. ,vol. 212, pp. 61- 66 ,(1998)
Hansen B, Hardie E, Prescription and use of analgesics in dogs and cats in a veterinary teaching hospital: 258 cases (1983-1989) Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association. ,vol. 202, pp. 1485- 1494 ,(1993)
Barbro Wadensten, Camilla Fröjd, Christine L Swenne, Torsten Gordh, Lena Gunningberg, Why is pain still not being assessed adequately? Results of a pain prevalence study in a university hospital in Sweden Journal of Clinical Nursing. ,vol. 20, pp. 624- 634 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1365-2702.2010.03482.X
Yoanna Skrobik, Stéphane Ahern, Martine Leblanc, François Marquis, Don Kelena Awissi, Brian P. Kavanagh, Protocolized intensive care unit management of analgesia, sedation, and delirium improves analgesia and subsyndromal delirium rates. Anesthesia & Analgesia. ,vol. 111, pp. 451- 463 ,(2010) , 10.1213/ANE.0B013E3181D7E1B8
Jaideep Vazirani, Jonathan C. Knott, Mandatory Pain Scoring at Triage Reduces Time to Analgesia Annals of Emergency Medicine. ,vol. 59, pp. 134- 138 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.ANNEMERGMED.2011.08.007
Peter J. Pascoe, Perioperative pain management. Veterinary Clinics of North America-small Animal Practice. ,vol. 30, pp. 917- 932 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0195-5616(08)70015-9
Robin J. Hamill-Ruth, Managing pain and agitation in the critically ill—Are we there yet?* Critical Care Medicine. ,vol. 34, pp. 1838- 1839 ,(2006) , 10.1097/01.CCM.0000220056.92653.3D
James S. Gaynor, Control of cancer pain in veterinary patients. Veterinary Clinics of North America-small Animal Practice. ,vol. 38, pp. 1429- 1448 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.CVSM.2008.06.009
Gerald Chanques, Samir Jaber, Eric Barbotte, Sophie Violet, Mustapha Sebbane, Pierre-François Perrigault, Claude Mann, Jean-Yves Lefrant, Jean-Jacques Eledjam, None, Impact of systematic evaluation of pain and agitation in an intensive care unit* Critical Care Medicine. ,vol. 34, pp. 1691- 1699 ,(2006) , 10.1097/01.CCM.0000218416.62457.56
A. Capner, B. D. X. Lascelles, A. E. Waterman-Pearson, Current British veterinary attitudes to perioperative analgesia for dogs Veterinary Record. ,vol. 145, pp. 95- 99 ,(1999) , 10.1136/VR.145.4.95