Impact assessment of abiotic resources in LCA: quantitative comparison of selected characterization models.

作者: Jakob T. Rørbech , Carl Vadenbo , Stefanie Hellweg , Thomas F. Astrup

DOI: 10.1021/ES5023976

关键词:

摘要: Resources have received significant attention in recent years resulting development of a wide range resource depletion indicators within life cycle assessment (LCA). Understanding the differences principles used to derive these and effects on impact results is critical for indicator selection interpretation results. Eleven methods were evaluated quantitatively with respect coverage, characterization factors (CF), contributions from individual resources, total scores. We included 2247 market inventory data sets covering societal activities (ecoinvent database v3.0). Log-linear regression analysis was carried out all pairwise combinations 11 identification correlations CFs (resources) impacts (inventory sets) between methods. Significant coverage observed (9-73 resources) revealing trade-off model complexity. High correlation did not necessarily manifest high impacts. This indicates that also may be Although no consistent applying similar models could observed, showed relatively regarding energy resources. Finally, we classify existing into three groups, according method focus modeling approach, aid LCA.

参考文章(25)
Manfred Klinglmair, Serenella Sala, Miguel Brandão, Assessing resource depletion in LCA: a review of methods and methodological issues International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 19, pp. 580- 592 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S11367-013-0650-9
Pilar Swart, Jo Dewulf, Quantifying the impacts of primary metal resource use in life cycle assessment based on recent mining data Resources Conservation and Recycling. ,vol. 73, pp. 180- 187 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2013.02.007
Jo Van Caneghem, Isabel Vermeulen, Chantal Block, Patrick Cramm, Ronald Mortier, Carlo Vandecasteele, Abiotic depletion due to resource consumption in a steelwork assessed by five different methods Resources Conservation and Recycling. ,vol. 54, pp. 1067- 1073 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2010.02.011
Michael E. Bösch, Stefanie Hellweg, Mark A. J. Huijbregts, Rolf Frischknecht, Applying cumulative exergy demand (CExD) indicators to the ecoinvent database The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 12, pp. 181- 190 ,(2007) , 10.1065/LCA2006.11.282
Olivier Jolliet, Manuele Margni, Raphaël Charles, Sébastien Humbert, Jérôme Payet, Gerald Rebitzer, Ralph Rosenbaum, IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 8, pp. 324- 330 ,(2003) , 10.1007/BF02978505
Bengt A. Steen, Abiotic Resource Depletion Different perceptions of the problem with mineral deposits The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 11, pp. 49- 54 ,(2006) , 10.1065/LCA2006.04.011
Laura Schneider, Markus Berger, Matthias Finkbeiner, The anthropogenic stock extended abiotic depletion potential (AADP) as a new parameterisation to model the depletion of abiotic resources International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 16, pp. 929- 936 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S11367-011-0313-7
Ana Carvalho, Ana Filipa Mimoso, Acácio Nobre Mendes, Henrique A. Matos, From a literature review to a framework for environmental process impact assessment index Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 64, pp. 36- 62 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.08.010
D.W. Pennington, J. Potting, G. Finnveden, E. Lindeijer, O. Jolliet, T. Rydberg, G. Rebitzer, Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice. Environment International. ,vol. 30, pp. 721- 739 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.ENVINT.2003.12.009
Bo Pedersen Weidema, Using the budget constraint to monetarise impact assessment results Ecological Economics. ,vol. 68, pp. 1591- 1598 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2008.01.019