作者: Sergi Valverde , Arnau Oliver , Mariano Cabezas , Eloy Roura , Xavier Lladó
DOI: 10.1002/JMRI.24517
关键词:
摘要: Purpose Ground-truth annotations from the well-known Internet Brain Segmentation Repository (IBSR) datasets consider Sulcal cerebrospinal fluid (SCSF) voxels as gray matter. This can lead to bias when evaluating performance of tissue segmentation methods. In this work we compare accuracy 10 brain methods analyzing effects SCSF ground-truth on estimations. Materials and Methods The set is composed by FAST, SPM5, SPM8, GAMIXTURE, ANN, FCM, KNN, SVPASEG, FANTASM, PVC. Methods are evaluated using original IBSR ranked means their pairwise comparisons permutation tests. Afterward, evaluation repeated without considering SCSF. Results The Dice coefficient all affected changes in annotations, especially SPM8 FAST. When not voxels, SVPASEG (0.90 ± 0.01) (0.91 ± 0.01) our study that appear more suitable for matter segmentation, while FAST (0.89 ± 0.02) best tool segmenting white tissue. Conclusion The images vary notably voxels. The fact three most common (FAST, SPM8) report an important change suggest these differences labeling new comparative studies. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2015;41:93–101.