摘要: This response refutes point (i) in the Ayres comment's abstract. It argues that at its heart responsive regulation is about seeking strategies will render more relational when it counts. possible even domains like tax compliance where 99 per cent of routine regulatory action occurs without face-to-face encounter. A number critiques special issue are embraced. While practitioners who reject civic republican values can learn from literature, conduces to tyranny if not explicit a value commitment reducing domination world. Concern elements argument have been insufficiently prominent subsequent writing authors therefore Freedom as non-domination requires transnational vision for with leverage reduce globally, just nationally. paradox advanced largest errors recent history on global stage best corrected by micro invented imagination crafting micro–macro linkages.