What about Assessment and Accountability?: Practical Implications for Educators.

作者: Judy Elliott , Jim Ysseldyke , Martha Thurlow , Ron Erickson

DOI: 10.1177/004005999803100103

关键词:

摘要: Students who are tested count in the information used by policymakers to make decisions about curriculum; allocation of resources; and development school, district, or state policies instructional process. Most these based on districtwide statewide assessments. And assessments from which students with disabilities typically excluded. This practice is change nationally because new regulations Individuals Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) district assessment. be included general assessment programs accommodations where necessary. for a very small percentage disabilities, an alternate must developed implemented no later than July 1, 2000.

参考文章(5)
Martha Thurlow, R Erickson, James Ysseldyke, Neglected Numerators, Drifting Denominators, and Fractured Fractions: Determining Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities in Statewide Assessment Programs (NCEO Synthesis Report) NCEO Publications Office, 350 Elliott Hall, 75 East River Road, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455; telephone: 612-626-1530; fax: 612-624-0879 ($5).. ,(1996)
Jim Ysseldyke, Ken Olsen, Putting Alternate Assessments into Practice: What to Measure and Possible Sources of Data Exceptional Children. ,vol. 65, pp. 175- 185 ,(1999) , 10.1177/001440299906500204
Mike Vanderwood, Kevin S. McGrew, James E. Ysseldyke, Why We Can't Say Much about Students with Disabilities during Education Reform: Exceptional Children. ,vol. 64, pp. 359- 370 ,(1998) , 10.1177/001440299806400305
Kevin S. McGrew, Martha L. Thurlow, Amy N. Spiegel, An Investigation of the Exclusion of Students With Disabilities in National Data Collection Programs Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. ,vol. 15, pp. 339- 352 ,(1993) , 10.3102/01623737015003339