Taking the “Soft Impacts” of Technology into Account: Broadening the Discourse in Research Practice

作者: Simone van der Burg

DOI: 10.1080/02691720903364191

关键词:

摘要: Public funding institutions are able to influence what aspects researchers take into account when they consider the future impacts of their research. On basis a description evaluation systems that public research institutes in Netherlands (STW and SenterNovem) use estimate quality engineering science, this article shows now predominantly required reflect on intellectual merit usability marketability technology it contributes to. In addition, SenterNovem also mandates reflection sustainability. Here is argued these requirements do not suffice. Funding should more enhance during process “soft impacts” technologies, which refer alterations technologies may bring about human life. To suggested helpful engage specifically trained ethicist monitor create ...

参考文章(33)
Philip Shapira, Stefan Kuhlmann, Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation: Experiences from the United States and Europe Scientific and Technical Documention Press. ,(2003)
Robert Frodeman, Carl Mitcham, Beyond the Social Contract Myth Issues in Science and Technology. ,vol. 16, ,(2000)
Sven Ove Hansson, Ethical criteria of risk acceptance Erkenntnis. ,vol. 59, pp. 291- 309 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1026005915919
Michael Gibbons, Science's new social contract with society Nature. ,vol. 402, ,(1999) , 10.1038/35011576
Clark W. Bullard, Shaping technology/Building society Journal of Technology Transfer. ,vol. 19, pp. 43- 44 ,(1994) , 10.1007/BF02373670
Alasdair C. MacIntyre, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory ,(1981)
George Khushf, An agenda for future debate on concepts of health and disease Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. ,vol. 10, pp. 19- 27 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S11019-006-9021-7