In)appropriate Personal Pronoun Use in Political Science A Qualitative Study and a Proposed Heuristic for Future Research

作者: Nigel Harwood

DOI: 10.1177/0741088306293921

关键词:

摘要: This article describes five political scientists’ interview-based accounts of appropriate and inappropriate use the pronouns I we in academic writing. The informants talked about pronoun with reference to one their own journal articles also by referring other informants’ texts. Beliefs varied widely, it was emphasized that discipline encompasses a number subdisciplines, which helps account for these differing preferences. insights implications study are discussed, heuristic combines corpus-based approaches investigation is proposed. part provides researcher data on typical disciplinary patterns use, whereas motivations intentions inform use. It argued could be adapted investigate linguistic features ...

参考文章(28)
Graeme D. Kennedy, An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics ,(1998)
Jaber F. Gubrium, James A. Holstein, The active interview ,(1995)
Keith R. B Morrison, Lawrence Manion, Louis Cohen, Research Methods in Education ,(1980)
A. Michael Huberman, Matthew B. Miles, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook ,(1994)
Irena Vassileva, Who am I/who are we in academic writing?L International Journal of Applied Linguistics. ,vol. 8, pp. 163- 185 ,(1998) , 10.1111/J.1473-4192.1998.TB00128.X