The Fallacies of the Assumptions Behind the Arguments for Goal-Line Technology in Soccer

作者: Tamba Nlandu

DOI: 10.1080/17511321.2012.745896

关键词:

摘要: Lately, a number of referee decisions appear to have reignited the debate over need bring more in-game officiating technology into soccer. The fallacies behind arguments for inclusion aid game officials can be narrowed down those current or against goal-line technology. Both proponents and opponents these overemphasise role referees point claiming that if refereeing errors could eliminated in situations, then most deserving team would time expected win contest. While we firmly believe soccer benefit immensely from infallible officiating, intend show are founded upon inconspicuous assumptions. First, they assume situations shown affect outcomes games than all other situations. This easily myth, since goals scored areas playi...

参考文章(6)
Nicholas Dixon, On Winning and Athletic Superiority Journal of The Philosophy of Sport. ,vol. 26, pp. 10- 26 ,(1999) , 10.1080/00948705.1999.9714576
Tamba Nlandu, One Play Cannot be Known to Win or Lose a Game: a Fallibilist Account of Game Sport, Ethics and Philosophy. ,vol. 5, pp. 21- 33 ,(2011) , 10.1080/17511321.2010.496735
Harry Collins, The Philosophy of Umpiring and the Introduction of Decision-Aid Technology Journal of The Philosophy of Sport. ,vol. 37, pp. 135- 146 ,(2010) , 10.1080/00948705.2010.9714772
Stephen Mumford, Truth makers for judgement calls European Journal of Sport Science. ,vol. 6, pp. 179- 186 ,(2006) , 10.1080/17461390600676267
Cesar R. Torres, What counts as part of a game? A look at skills. Journal of The Philosophy of Sport. ,vol. 27, pp. 81- 92 ,(2000) , 10.1080/00948705.2000.9714591