Variation in Orosensory Responsiveness to Alcoholic Beverages and Their Constituents—the Role of the Thermal Taste Phenotype

作者: Stephanie Small-Kelly , Gary Pickering

DOI: 10.1007/S12078-019-09266-8

关键词:

摘要: Orosensory perception strongly influences food and beverage liking consumption. Differences between individuals in orosensation present an opportunity to conceptualize commercialize products based on consumer “taste” responsiveness. The main objective of this study was examine how the thermal taste phenotype associates with orosensory responsiveness beer cider, more generally differences relationships alcohol-relevant stimuli beer/cider. Sixty participants (31 tasters (TTs) 29 non-tasters (TnTs)) rated intensity aqueous solutions beer- cider-relevant tastants: iso-α-acid (bitterness), ethanol (irritation, bitterness, sweetness), dextrose (sweetness), citric acid (sourness) at concentrations typically found commercial generalized labeled magnitude scales (gLMS). Intensity ratings (gLMS) multiple orosensations elicited by six two cider samples differing content were also collected. TTs scored bitterness intensely than did TnTs (p(t) < 0.05) sourness, astringency, overall sampled beers ciders higher TnT (p(F) < 0.05). Thermal status is important determinant flavor. These results may assist product developers designing targeted specific segments that differ responsiveness, inform broader understanding sources variation human alcohol constituents beverages.

参考文章(48)
D.K. Parker, Beer: production, sensory characteristics and sensory analysis Alcoholic Beverages#R##N#Sensory Evaluation and Consumer Research. pp. 133- 158 ,(2012) , 10.1533/9780857095176.2.133
Charles W. Bamforth, Beer: A Quality Perspective ,(2011)
M. C. Meilgaard, C. E. Dalgliesh, J. F. Clapperton, BEER FLAVOUR TERMINOLOGY1 Journal of the Institute of Brewing. ,vol. 85, pp. 38- 42 ,(1979) , 10.1002/J.2050-0416.1979.TB06826.X
Alberto Cruz, Barry G. Green, Thermal stimulation of taste Nature. ,vol. 403, pp. 889- 892 ,(2000) , 10.1038/35002581
G.J. PICKERING, A. MOYES, M.R. BAJEC, N. DECOURVILLE, Thermal taster status associates with oral sensations elicited by wine Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. ,vol. 16, pp. 361- 367 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1755-0238.2010.00098.X
Qian Yang, Tracey Hollowood, Joanne Hort, Phenotypic variation in oronasal perception and the relative effects of PROP and Thermal Taster Status Food Quality and Preference. ,vol. 38, pp. 83- 91 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.FOODQUAL.2014.05.013
B GREEN, M ALVAREZREEVES, P GEORGE, C AKIRAV, Chemesthesis and taste: evidence of independent processing of sensation intensity. Physiology & Behavior. ,vol. 86, pp. 526- 537 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.PHYSBEH.2005.08.038
Linda M. Bartoshuk, Valerie B. Duffy, Inglis J. Miller, PTC/PROP tasting: Anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects Physiology & Behavior. ,vol. 56, pp. 1165- 1171 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90361-1
Rossella Di Monaco, Chengcheng Su, Paolo Masi, Silvana Cavella, Temporal Dominance of Sensations: A review Trends in Food Science and Technology. ,vol. 38, pp. 104- 112 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.TIFS.2014.04.007