Nepal: Federalism for Lasting Peace

作者: Syed Mansoob Murshed , Shiv Raj Bhatt

DOI: 10.5897/JLCR.9000032

关键词:

摘要: Many studies have been conducted on the causes and consequences of Nepal’s conflict. Given current peace, proposals federal restructuring, mostly based ethnic sub-divisions country, are rife. Federal restructuring it is believed, will be instrumental in power sharing peace long run. It also believed that federalism promote inclusive development by granting political autonomy to states (regions) assuring proportional fair representation all ethnic/sub-cultural groups future governments other decision-making organs state. However, not yet clear what kind this multi-ethnic country have. analysts see as an over-ambitious challenging task for Nepal. There a fear any hurried decision direction may further intensify underlying conflict ultimately cause disintegration country. Furthermore, economic issues like revenue expenditure resource mobilization fully spelled out proponents federalism. This paper suggests alternative basis nation, which promotes long-term sustainable peace.   Key words: Nepal, post-conflict reconstruction, reconstruction.

参考文章(39)
Timothy D. Sisk, Francis Fukuyama, Power sharing and international mediation in ethnic conflicts ,(1996)
Syed Mansoob Murshed, None, Explaining Civil War: A Rational Choice Approach ,(2010)
Bishnu Raj Upreti, None, The price of neglect : from resource conflict to Maoist insurgency in the Himalayan kingdom Bhrikuti Academic Publications. ,(2004)
Nicholas Sambanis, Paul Collier, Understanding civil war : evidence and analysis World Bank. ,(2005)
Arend Lijphart, Power-sharing in South Africa ,(1985)
Richard M. Bird, Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations: Universal Principles, Local Applications Research Papers in Economics. ,(2000)
Jose Cuesta, Mansoob Murshed, The Micro-foundations of Social Contracts, Civil Conflicts and International Peace-Making Research Papers in Economics. ,(2008)
Pranab Bardhan, Dilip Mookherjee, Capture and Governance at Local and National Levels The American Economic Review. ,vol. 90, pp. 135- 139 ,(2000) , 10.1257/AER.90.2.135