Factors Impacting False Positive Recall in Screening Mammography

作者: Evan L Honig , Lisa A Mullen , Tali Amir , Matthew D Alvin , Mary K Jones

DOI: 10.1016/J.ACRA.2019.01.020

关键词:

摘要: Rationale and Objectives Our objective was to identify factors impacting false positive recalls in screening mammography. Materials Methods We retrospectively reviewed our mammography database from August 31, 2015 September 30, 2016, including full field digital mammograms (FFDM) breast tomosynthesis (DBT) mammograms. False (FP) exams were defined as Breast Imaging-Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) 1 or 2 assessments at diagnostic imaging with year cancer-free follow-up, 3 assessment years cancer free biopsy benign pathology. True positives malignant pathology on surgical excision. evaluated the association of FP multiple patient-level features. Results A total 22,055 performed, 1887 patients recalled (recall rate 8.6%). Recall lower for DBT than (8.0% vs 10.6%, p Conclusion significantly less likely DBT, older women, prior available comparison, histories biopsy. This study supports importance using setting obtaining comparison.

参考文章(35)
Elizabeth S. McDonald, Anne Marie McCarthy, Amana L. Akhtar, Marie B. Synnestvedt, Mitchell Schnall, Emily F. Conant, Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 205, pp. 1143- 1148 ,(2015) , 10.2214/AJR.15.14406
Evan R. Myers, Patricia Moorman, Jennifer M. Gierisch, Laura J. Havrilesky, Lars J. Grimm, Sujata Ghate, Brittany Davidson, Ranee Chatterjee Mongtomery, Matthew J. Crowley, Douglas C. McCrory, Amy Kendrick, Gillian D. Sanders, Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review JAMA. ,vol. 314, pp. 1615- 1634 ,(2015) , 10.1001/JAMA.2015.13183
Douglas Bates, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, Steve Walker, Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 Journal of Statistical Software. ,vol. 67, pp. 1- 48 ,(2015) , 10.18637/JSS.V067.I01
Ana Paula Atihé Benveniste, Adriana Helena Padovan Grassmann Ferreira, Vera Lúcia Nunes Aguillar, Dupla leitura no rastreamento mamográfico Radiologia Brasileira. ,vol. 39, pp. 85- 89 ,(2006) , 10.1590/S0100-39842006000200003
Nehmat Houssami, Petra Macaskill, Daniela Bernardi, Francesca Caumo, Marco Pellegrini, Silvia Brunelli, Paola Tuttobene, Paola Bricolo, Carmine Fantò, Marvi Valentini, Stefano Ciatto, Breast screening using 2D-mammography or integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for single-reading or double-reading--evidence to guide future screening strategies. European Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 50, pp. 1799- 1807 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.EJCA.2014.03.017
Robert D. Rosenberg, Sebastien J. P. A. Haneuse, Berta M. Geller, Diana S. M. Buist, Diana L. Miglioretti, R. James Brenner, Rebecca Smith-Bindman, Stephen H. Taplin, Timeliness of Follow-up after Abnormal Screening Mammogram: Variability of Facilities Radiology. ,vol. 261, pp. 404- 413 ,(2011) , 10.1148/RADIOL.11102472
Susan C. Harvey, Berta Geller, Robert G. Oppenheimer, Melanie Pinet, Leslie Riddell, Brian Garra, Increase in cancer detection and recall rates with independent double interpretation of screening mammography. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 180, pp. 1461- 1467 ,(2003) , 10.2214/AJR.180.5.1801461
Inger Schou Bredal, Rolf Kåresen, Per Skaane, Kari Sletten Engelstad, Øivind Ekeberg, Recall mammography and psychological distress European Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 49, pp. 805- 811 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.EJCA.2012.09.001