作者: Evan L Honig , Lisa A Mullen , Tali Amir , Matthew D Alvin , Mary K Jones
DOI: 10.1016/J.ACRA.2019.01.020
关键词:
摘要: Rationale and Objectives Our objective was to identify factors impacting false positive recalls in screening mammography. Materials Methods We retrospectively reviewed our mammography database from August 31, 2015 September 30, 2016, including full field digital mammograms (FFDM) breast tomosynthesis (DBT) mammograms. False (FP) exams were defined as Breast Imaging-Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) 1 or 2 assessments at diagnostic imaging with year cancer-free follow-up, 3 assessment years cancer free biopsy benign pathology. True positives malignant pathology on surgical excision. evaluated the association of FP multiple patient-level features. Results A total 22,055 performed, 1887 patients recalled (recall rate 8.6%). Recall lower for DBT than (8.0% vs 10.6%, p Conclusion significantly less likely DBT, older women, prior available comparison, histories biopsy. This study supports importance using setting obtaining comparison.