Governing the futures of non-invasive prenatal testing: An exploration of social acceptability using the Delphi method

作者: Charles Dupras , Stanislav Birko , Aliya O. Affdal , Hazar Haidar , Marie-Eve Lemoine

DOI: 10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2020.112930

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers numerous benefits to pregnant women and their families. It also raises ethical, legal social concerns regarding, for instance, the possible effects of a routinization genetic on free informed decision-making by prospective parents, role state in governing its use. Technological advances are allowing cfDNA analyses detect an increasing number risks conditions fetus, potentially further exacerbating such concerns. From May 2015 December 2016, we conducted three-round Policy Delphi study (NR1 = 61, NR2 = 58, NR3 = 47; overall retention rate = 77.0%) explore acceptability (SA) current potential future uses NIPT Canada according participants with relevant professional, research or advocacy expertise. Participants came from four groups: healthcare professionals (NR3 = 14), sciences humanities researchers (NR3 = 13), patients/disability rights advocates cultural/religious communities (NR3 = 6). This paper presents SA criteria contextual contingencies assessment NIPT's group. reports what (conditions motives) thought should be banned, permitted, publicly funded, promoted as public health strategy. According them, resulting severe pain early death, well trisomies (13, 18, 21) sex chromosome abnormalities, covered Canadian insurance. However, there was wide agreement that direct-to-consumer legally fetal non-medical reasons either proscribed discouraged. In addition identifying areas consensus, our results point disagreement required level governance whole-genome sequencing late onset low penetrance. provides model exploring emerging technologies method.

参考文章(88)
Gene Rowe, Perspectives on Expertise in the Aggregation of Judgments Expertise and Decision Support. pp. 155- 180 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-0-585-34290-0_8
Thomas Webler, Ortwin Renn, Peter M. Wiedemann, Fairness and competence in citizen participation : evaluating models for environmental discourse Kluwer Academic. ,(1995)
Andre L. Delbecq, Andrew H. Van de Ven, David H. Gustafson, Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes ,(1986)
Abby Lippman, Prenatal genetic testing and screening: constructing needs and reinforcing inequities. American Journal of Law & Medicine. ,vol. 17, pp. 15- 50 ,(1991) , 10.1017/S0098858800007917
René von Schomberg, A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation Social Science Research Network. pp. 51- 74 ,(2013) , 10.1002/9781118551424.CH3
Celine Lewis, Melissa Hill, Heather Skirton, Lyn S. Chitty, Fetal sex determination using cell-free fetal DNA: service users' experiences of and preferences for service delivery. Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 32, pp. 735- 741 ,(2012) , 10.1002/PD.3893
Steven M Flipse, Maarten C A Sanden, Maud Radstake, Johannes H De Winde, Patricia Osseweijer, The DNA of socially responsible innovation EMBO reports. ,vol. 15, pp. 134- 137 ,(2014) , 10.1002/EMBR.201337949