ASR forum:Engaging with African informal economies: institutions, security, and pastoralism: Exploring the limits of hybridity

作者: Frances Cleaver , Tom Franks , Faustin Maganga , Kurt Hall

DOI: 10.1017/ASR.2013.84

关键词:

摘要: This article furthers our understanding of how state and citizens interact to produce local institutions examines the effects these processes. It brings critical institutional theory into engagement with ideas about everyday governance analyze hybrid arrangements are formed through bricolage. Such a perspective helps us understand as both negotiated structured, benefiting some disadvantaging others. To explore points tracks evolution Sungusungu, pastoralist security institution in Usangu Plains, Tanzania. also considers wider implications such for livelihoods, social inclusion, distributive justice, citizenship.

参考文章(60)
A. Neef, J. Sehring, Path dependencies and institutional bricolage in post-Soviet water governance. Water alternatives. ,vol. 2, pp. 61- 81 ,(2009)
Katherine Scholfield, Daniel Brockington, Hassan Sachedina, Preserving the New Tanzania: Conservation and Land Use Change* International Journal of African Historical Studies. ,vol. 41, pp. 557- 579 ,(2008)
A. Neef, Special Section: Transformations of rural water governance. Water alternatives. ,vol. 2, pp. 53- 137 ,(2009)
Anthony Giddens, The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration University of California Press. ,(1984)
Simon E. Cook, Douglas J. Merrey, Fostering Institutional Creativity at Multiple Levels: Towards Facilitated Institutional Bricolage Water alternatives. ,vol. 5, pp. 1- 19 ,(2012)