Psychological effects of a suspicious prostate cancer screening test followed by a benign biopsy result.

作者: Mary McNaughton-Collins , Floyd J. Fowler , Jean-Francois Caubet , David W. Bates , Jeong Min Lee

DOI: 10.1016/J.AMJMED.2004.06.036

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Purpose To evaluate the psychological implications of an apparently false-positive screening result for prostate cancer. Methods The sample comprised 167 men with a benign biopsy in response to suspicious test (biopsy group) and 233 normal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (control group). responded questionnaire within about 6 weeks their or PSA results. They were asked demographic characteristics, medical history, effects, experience, cancer knowledge. Results survey rate was 85% (400/471). mean (± SD) age respondents 60 ± 9 years (range, 40 88 years); 88% (n = 350) white. Forty-nine percent (81/167) group reported having thought either "a lot" "some time", compared 18% (42/230) control ( P Conclusion Men who underwent more often worried cancer, despite received result. This underrecognized human cost should be considered debate benefits harms screening. Am J Med. 2004;117:719 -725.

参考文章(33)
Brenda E. Sirovich, Lisa M. Schwartz, Steven Woloshin, Screening Men for Prostate and Colorectal Cancer in the United States ,(2003)
M Patrick C. Walsh, Campbell's urology / Saunders,. ,(2013)
E D Pisano, J Earp, M Schell, K Vokaty, A Denham, Screening behavior of women after a false-positive mammogram. Radiology. ,vol. 208, pp. 245- 249 ,(1998) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.208.1.9646820
Michael J. Barry, Craig Fleming, Christopher M. Coley, John H. Wasson, Marianne C. Fahs, Joseph E. Oesterling, Should Medicare provide reimbursement for prostate-specific antigen testing for early detection of prostate cancer? Part IV: Estimating the risks and benefits of an early detection program. Urology. ,vol. 46, pp. 445- 461 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80255-6
Caryn Lerman, Bruce Track, Barbara K Rimer, Alice Boyce, Chris Jepson, Paul F Engstrom, Psychological and Behavioral Implications of Abnormal Mammograms Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 114, pp. 657- 661 ,(1991) , 10.7326/0003-4819-114-8-657
R Ellman, N Angeli, A Christians, S Moss, J Chamberlain, P Maguire, Psychiatric morbidity associated with screening for breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 60, pp. 781- 784 ,(1989) , 10.1038/BJC.1989.359
DAN LEIBOVICI, AMNON ZISMAN, YORAM I. SIEGEL, AVISHAY SELLA, JUDY KLEINMANN, ARIE LINDNER, Local anesthesia for prostate biopsy by periprostatic lidocaine injection: a double-blind placebo controlled study. The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 167, pp. 563- 565 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)69086-4
A.R Aro, S Pilvikki Absetz, T.M van Elderen, E van der Ploeg, L.J.Th van der Kamp, False-positive findings in mammography screening induces short-term distress - breast cancer-specific concern prevails longer. European Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 36, pp. 1089- 1097 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00065-4
Brenda E. Sirovich, Lisa M. Schwartz, Steven Woloshin, Screening men for prostate and colorectal cancer in the United States: does practice reflect the evidence? JAMA. ,vol. 289, pp. 1414- 1420 ,(2003) , 10.1001/JAMA.289.11.1414