The ED95 of Nalbuphine in Outpatient‐Induced Abortion Compared to Equivalent Sufentanil

作者: Limei Chen , Yamei Zhou , Yaoyao Cai , Nana Bao , Xuzhong Xu

DOI: 10.1111/BCPT.13022

关键词:

摘要: This prospective study evaluated the 95% effective dose (ED95 ) of nalbuphine in inhibiting body movement during outpatient-induced abortion and its clinical efficacy versus equivalent sufentanil. The was divided into two parts. For first part, voluntary first-trimester patients who needed induced abortions were recruited to measure ED95 using sequential method (the Dixon up-and-down method). In second this a double-blind, randomized study. Sixty cases randomly groups (n = 30), including group N (nalbuphine at dose) S (sufentanil an dose). Propofol given both as sedative. circulation, respiration surgery observed. amount propofol, awakening time, time leave hospital analgesic effect recorded. painless surgical 0.128 mg/kg (95% confidence intervals 0.098-0.483 mg/kg). Both sufentanil provided good intraoperative post-operative abortion. However, morbidity dizziness for less than (p < 0.05), significantly shorter those 0.05). Nalbuphine used showed better compared with

参考文章(12)
Zheng Zeng, Jianhua Lu, Chang Shu, Yuanli Chen, Tong Guo, Qing-ping Wu, Shang-long Yao, Ping Yin, A comparision of nalbuphine with morphine for analgesic effects and safety : meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Scientific Reports. ,vol. 5, pp. 10927- 10927 ,(2015) , 10.1038/SREP10927
Matthias Paul, Dennis M. Fisher, Are Estimates of MAC Reliable Anesthesiology. ,vol. 95, pp. 1362- 1370 ,(2001) , 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00014
Vincent Bounes, Romain Barthélémy, Olivier Diez, Sandrine Charpentier, Jean Louis Montastruc, Jean Louis Ducassé, Sufentanil Is Not Superior to Morphine for the Treatment of Acute Traumatic Pain in an Emergency Setting: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Out-of-Hospital Trial Annals of Emergency Medicine. ,vol. 56, pp. 509- 516 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.ANNEMERGMED.2010.03.020
W.J. Dixon, Staircase bioassay: the up-and-down method. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. ,vol. 15, pp. 47- 50 ,(1991) , 10.1016/S0149-7634(05)80090-9
Priyanka Gokhale, Justin R. Lappen, Jonathan H. Waters, Lisa K. Perriera, Intravenous Sedation Without Intubation and the Risk of Anesthesia Complications for Obese and Non-Obese Women Undergoing Surgical Abortion: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Anesthesia & Analgesia. ,vol. 122, pp. 1957- 1962 ,(2016) , 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001335
Muhammad Ahsan-ul-Haq, Etizaz Haider Kazmi, Zahid Akhtar Rao, Nalbuphine prevents haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation. Jcpsp-journal of The College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. ,vol. 15, pp. 668- 670 ,(2005)
Wei Gao, Baoyong Sha, Yuan Zhao, Zhe Fan, Lin Liu, Xin Shen, Comparison of simultaneous and sequential administration of fentanyl–propofol for surgical abortion: a randomized single-blinded controlled trial Artificial Cells Nanomedicine and Biotechnology. ,vol. 45, pp. 1045- 1050 ,(2017) , 10.1080/21691401.2016.1239106
T. Linet, Interruption volontaire de grossesse instrumentale Journal De Gynecologie Obstetrique Et Biologie De La Reproduction. ,vol. 45, pp. 1515- 1535 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.JGYN.2016.09.026