Examining Mechanims of Political Disagreement

作者: Scott D. McClurg , Anand Sokhey , J. Drew Seib

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: This research seeks to develop and test hypotheses about how political disagreement in social networks affects behavior. We conduct experimental whether subjects’ acquaintances act as independent sources of information, examine two different models such stimuli may produce effects—either via information seeking, or shortcuts. These tests are important because prior is ambiguous on causal effects come from networks, potential mechanisms influence. Our results back aspects both models, but more strongly support the notion a heuristic—subjects primed consider before mock election exhibited less-orderly search process; those after (but voting) displayed lower rates ambivalence, evidence that helped clarify their decisions.

参考文章(36)
Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, The spiral of silence ,(1984)
R. Robert Huckfeldt, John D. Sprague, P. E. Johnson, Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks ,(2004)
Milton Lodge, Charles Taber, Elements of Reason: Three Steps toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning Cambridge University Press. pp. 183- 213 ,(2000) , 10.1017/CBO9780511805813.009
Henry E. Brady, Paul M. Sniderman, Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning American Political Science Review. ,vol. 79, pp. 1061- 1078 ,(1985) , 10.2307/1956248
David P. Redlawsk, What Voters Do: Information Search During Election Campaigns Political Psychology. ,vol. 25, pp. 595- 610 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1467-9221.2004.00389.X
Robert Huckfeldt, The Social Communication of Political Expertise American Journal of Political Science. ,vol. 45, pp. 425- ,(2001) , 10.2307/2669350
Scott D. McClurg, Indirect Mobilization: The Social Consequences of Party Contacts in an Election Campaign American Politics Research. ,vol. 32, pp. 406- 443 ,(2004) , 10.1177/1532673X03260581