Stimulation in the NICU: is more necessarily better?

作者: Patricia L. Linn , Frances Degen Horowitz , Howard A. Fox

DOI: 10.1016/S0095-5108(18)30874-1

关键词:

摘要: Animal studies and with human full-term infants suggest that the stimulation present in utero affects postnatal preferences levels of response. The premature infant does not necessarily benefit from a re-creation environment. Each aspect environment should be assessed independently as potential source added NICU to determine its possible effects on development infant. cannot accurately labeled by global descriptors "deprivation" or "overstimulation." When compared home environments lower SES homes, different aspects were recorded more often, less equally often infants' homes. Baseline any prior institution an intervention program. caregivers tended respond contingently their patients' behaviors. However, prematures provided few opportunities for nurses respond, when visual vocal behaviors used employed expected norm. Perhaps both medical staff parents trained recognize subtle, cues described Als et al. being prevalent behavioral repertoire Based ecologic descriptions NICU's, researchers have suggested inappropriate pattern may characterize environment, rather than amount stimulation. has been characterized providing little cross-modal stimulation, temporally patterned stimuli, diurnal rhythmicity. In addition, control contrary infant's experiences. There is evidence some negative Individual level maturation. Interventions individualized particular needs each infant, subjecting all assigned treatment condition "package." worthy goal promoting carries it responsibility ensuring no harmful could befall one

参考文章(31)
L. Alan Sroufe, Richard Arend, Frederick L. Gove, Continuity of Individual Adaptation from Infancy to Kindergarten: A Predictive Study of Ego-Resiliency and Curiosity in Preschoolers Child Development. ,vol. 50, pp. 950- None ,(1979) , 10.2307/1129319
SE Armitage, BA Baldwin, MA Vince, The fetal sound environment of sheep. Science. ,vol. 208, pp. 1173- 1174 ,(1980) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.7375927
Kathryn E. Barnard, Helen L. Bee, The Impact of Temporally Patterned Stimulation on the Development of Preterm Infants Child Development. ,vol. 54, pp. 1156- None ,(1983) , 10.2307/1129671
J. Birnholz, B. Benacerraf, The development of human fetal hearing. Science. ,vol. 222, pp. 516- 518 ,(1983) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.6623091
Kayreen A. Burns, Ruth B. Deddish, William J. Burns, Roger P. Hatcher, Use of oscillating waterbeds and rhythmic sounds for premature infant stimulation Developmental Psychology. ,vol. 19, pp. 746- 751 ,(1983) , 10.1037/0012-1649.19.5.746
Pamela A. Davies, J. P. M. Tizard, Very low birthweight and subsequent neurological defect (with special reference to spastic diplegia). Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. ,vol. 17, pp. 3- 17 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1469-8749.1975.TB04951.X
AJ DeCasper, WP Fifer, Of human bonding: newborns prefer their mothers' voices Science. ,vol. 208, pp. 1174- 1176 ,(1980) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.7375928
Anthony J. Decasper, Phyllis A. Prescott, Human newborns' perception of male voices: preference, discrimination, and reinforcing value. Developmental Psychobiology. ,vol. 17, pp. 481- 491 ,(1984) , 10.1002/DEV.420170506
Anthony J. DeCasper, Ann Dinsmoor Sigafoos, The intrauterine heartbeat: A potent reinforcer for newborns Infant Behavior and Development. ,vol. 6, pp. 19- 25 ,(1983) , 10.1016/S0163-6383(83)80004-6
S. A. Falk, J. C. Farmer, Incubator Noise and Possible Deafness Archives of Otolaryngology-head & Neck Surgery. ,vol. 97, pp. 385- 387 ,(1973) , 10.1001/ARCHOTOL.1973.00780010397006