Development of mixed-oak forests in southeastern Ohio: a comparison of second-growth and old-growth forests

作者: P.Charles Goebel , David M. Hix

DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(96)03772-3

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Traditionally, studies of forest development have independently focused on the compositional and structural differences second-growth old-growth forests. However, few attempted to use current ecosystems as a benchmark with which compare composition, structure, dynamics surrounding matrix sequentially aged In order examine mixed-oak forests we compared stand seventeen relatively undisturbed (70–149 years old) four (at least 150 south-facing ecological landtypes (ELTs) in southeastern Ohio. All living dead trees over 10.0 cm dbh coarse woody debris mid-diameter were inventoried 500-m 2 plots. Saplings seedlings sampled nested 100-m 2-m subplots, respectively. Principal components analysis (PCA) was used support assumption that study sites had similar soils physiography. Overstory species richness greatest younger stands, significantly differed among age classes. Five oaks ( Quercus spp.) dominated overstories all stands. white oak alba L.) canopy importance value (IV) ((relative dominance + relative density)/2) stands; it ranged from 35.5% stands 70–89 old 86.1% 130–149 old, while comprised 46.5% canopies. Pignut hickory Carya glabra (Mill.) Sweet.) IV tended be less than Whereas they almost absent sapling layer (less 5% total densities). The layers classes shade-tolerant species. For example, American beech Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.) density between year (6.3%) at (23.9%). Even though densities saplings low, much greater, suggesting adequate advance regeneration. Few significant structure (e.g. basal area, density, mean diameter, closure) or standing fallen detected Detrended correspondence analyses (DCA) appeared represent gradient increasing age. Although indices attributes proven successful discriminating other regions North America, our results suggest such an index would not work well Canopies by mixture oaks, conjunction majority individuals may best indicators conditions

参考文章(62)
G. F. Lamb, Wilber Stout, Physiographic Features of Southeastern Ohio ,(1938)
Lee E Frelich, Old forest in the lake states today and before European settlement Natural Areas Journal. ,vol. 15, pp. 157- 167 ,(1995)
David M. Hix, Andrea M. Chech, Development of an ecological classification system for the Wayne National Forest In: Gillespie, Andrew R.; Parker, George R.; Pope, Phillip E.; Rink, George: eds. Proceedings of the 9th Central Hardwood Forest Conference; Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-161. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station: 491-501. ,vol. 161, ,(1993)
Stephen R. Shifley, Brian L. Brookshire, Lynn M. Roovers, Structural and compositional differences between old-growth and mature second-growth forests in the Missouri Ozarks In: Gottschalk, Kurt W.; Fosbroke, Sandra L. C., ed. Proceedings, 10th Central Hardwood Forest Conference; 1995 March 5-8; Morgantown, WV.: Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-197. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 23-36. ,vol. 197, ,(1995)
Alan J. Rebertus, Stephen R. Shifley, R. Hoyt Richards, Stephen J. Chaplin, Characteristics and dynamics of an upland Missouri old-growth forest In: Gottschalk, Kurt W.; Fosbroke, Sandra L. C., ed. Proceedings, 10th Central Hardwood Forest Conference; 1995 March 5-8; Morgantown, WV.: Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-197. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 11-22. ,vol. 197, ,(1995)
John T. Auten, , Notes on Some Old-Growth Forests in Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois Auten, J. T. 1941. Notes on old growth forests in Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois. Technical Note No. 49. USDA Forest Service, Central States Forest Experiment Station.. ,vol. 049, ,(1941) , 10.5962/BHL.TITLE.121275
F.H. Eyre, Forest cover types of the United States and Canada Washington, D.C. (USA) SAF. ,(1980)