Routine but risky: A multi-centre analysis of the outcomes of cranioplasty in the Northeast of England

作者: Ian C Coulter , Jonathan D Pesic-Smith , William B Cato-Addison , Shahid A Khan , Daniel Thompson

DOI: 10.1007/S00701-014-2081-1

关键词:

摘要: Cranioplasty is undertaken as a routine secondary operation following craniectomy. At time when decompressive craniectomy being evaluated by several large trials, we aimed to evaluate the morbidity associated with cranioplasty and investigate its potential effect on outcome. The outcomes of 166 patients undergoing at two centres in United Kingdom between June 2006 September 2011 were retrospectively analysed. Outcome measures included mortality, functional outcome determined modified Rankin score (mRS) last follow-up. A logistic regression analysis was performed model predict determinants related neurological cranioplasty. Sixty-seven out (40.4 %) experienced least one complication during median follow-up 15 months (inter-quartile range 5-38 months). Thirty six (21.7 %) developed infection requiring antibiotics, 27 (16.3 %) removal Nine 25 (36 %) bi-frontal defects an whereas 21 153 (16.4 %) defect other than (Chi square p = 0.009). Further surgery groups required 16.4 % 11.7, % respectively. Pseudomeningocoele (9 %), seizures (8.4 %) poor cosmesis (7.2 %) also commonly observed. Logistic identified initial (p < 0.03), mRS (p < 0.0001) complications (p < 0.04) predictive Age timing not harbours significant morbidity, risk that appears be higher bifrontal defect. influence subsequent cranioplasty, early or late, after does impact ultimate These findings should considered making decisions relating

参考文章(50)
Victor Chang, Paul Hartzfeld, Marianne Langlois, Asim Mahmood, Donald Seyfried, Outcomes of cranial repair after craniectomy. Journal of Neurosurgery. ,vol. 112, pp. 1120- 1124 ,(2010) , 10.3171/2009.6.JNS09133
Brandon G. Rocque, Kaushik Amancherla, Sean M. Lew, Sandi Lam, Outcomes of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in the pediatric population Journal of Neurosurgery. ,vol. 12, pp. 120- 125 ,(2013) , 10.3171/2013.4.PEDS12605
Brian P. Walcott, Churl-Su Kwon, Sameer A. Sheth, Corey R. Fehnel, Robert M. Koffie, Wael F. Asaad, Brian V. Nahed, Jean-Valery Coumans, Predictors of cranioplasty complications in stroke and trauma patients. Journal of Neurosurgery. ,vol. 118, pp. 757- 762 ,(2013) , 10.3171/2013.1.JNS121626
Mark P. Piedra, Eric M. Thompson, Nathan R. Selden, Brian T. Ragel, Daniel J. Guillaume, Optimal timing of autologous cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy in children. Journal of Neurosurgery. ,vol. 10, pp. 268- 272 ,(2012) , 10.3171/2012.6.PEDS1268
Dushan Thavarajah, Patricia De Lacy, Ahmed Hussien, Adrian Sugar, The minimum time for cranioplasty insertion from craniectomy is six months to reduce risk of infection--a case series of 82 patients. British Journal of Neurosurgery. ,vol. 26, pp. 78- 80 ,(2012) , 10.3109/02688697.2011.603850
J C van Swieten, P J Koudstaal, M C Visser, H J Schouten, J van Gijn, Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. ,vol. 19, pp. 604- 607 ,(1988) , 10.1161/01.STR.19.5.604
E. Archavlis, Mario Carvi Y Nievas, The impact of timing of cranioplasty in patients with large cranial defects after decompressive hemicraniectomy. Acta Neurochirurgica. ,vol. 154, pp. 1055- 1062 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S00701-012-1333-1
Dorothee Wachter, Kim Reineke, Timo Behm, Veit Rohde, Cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: underestimated surgery-associated complications? Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. ,vol. 115, pp. 1293- 1297 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.CLINEURO.2012.12.002
Andreas Bender, Sandrine Heulin, Stefan Röhrer, Jan-Hinnerk Mehrkens, Volkmar Heidecke, Andreas Straube, Thomas Pfefferkorn, Early cranioplasty may improve outcome in neurological patients with decompressive craniectomy. Brain Injury. ,vol. 27, pp. 1073- 1079 ,(2013) , 10.3109/02699052.2013.794972