Utah's Alternate Assessment: Evidence regarding Six Aspects of Validity.
作者： Timothy A. Slocum , Karen D. Hager
DOI:
关键词:
摘要: Utah State University Abstract: Alternate assessments are the means through which students with significant cognitive disabilities participate in accountability testing, thus measurement validity of alternate is a critical aspect state educational systems. When evaluating assessment systems, it important to take broad view that acknowledges its many facets. Evidence regarding six aspects Utah's Assessment (UAA) presented this paper. These are: (a) test content, (b) performance standards, (c) administration test, (d) reliability scoring, (e) stability scores, and (f) impact use UAA. Results study conducted on UAA along recommen- dations for improving system based these results.
jstor.org 参考文章(16)
Patricia Burgess, Sarah Kennedy, What Gets Tested, Gets Taught; Who Gets Tested, Gets Taught: Curriculum Framework Development Process. Alternative formats: Mid-South Regional Resource Center, Interdisciplinary Human Development Institute, 126 Mineral Industries Building, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0051; Tel: 606-257-4921; Fax: 606-257-4353; Web site: http://aww.ihdi.uky.edu/msrrc. ,(1998)
Patricia A. Lowe, Cecil R. Reynolds, Kimberly F. Applequist, Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEIA), PL 108‐446 Encyclopedia of Special Education. pp. 1095- 1106 ,(2008) , 10.1002/9780470373699.SPECED1080
Rachel Christina, Laura S. Hamilton, Ron Zimmer, No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Phi Delta Kappa International, Inc. ,(2010)
Martha Thurlow, Jason Altman, Sandra Thompson, Christopher Johnstone, 2005 State Special Education Outcomes: Steps Forward in a Decade of Change. National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota. ,(2005)
Jim Ysseldyke, Ken Olsen, Putting Alternate Assessments into Practice: What to Measure and Possible Sources of Data Exceptional Children. ,vol. 65, pp. 175- 185 ,(1999) , 10.1177/001440299906500204
Terry J. Crooks, Michael T. Kane, Allan S. Cohen, Threats to the Valid Use of Assessments Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. ,vol. 3, pp. 265- 286 ,(1996) , 10.1080/0969594960030302
Trevor F. Stokes, Donald M. Baer, An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. ,vol. 10, pp. 349- 367 ,(1977) , 10.1901/JABA.1977.10-349
Samuel Messick, STANDARDS OF VALIDITY AND THE VALIDITY OF STANDARDS IN PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. ,vol. 14, pp. 5- 8 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1995.TB00881.X
Samuel Messick, Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons' Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning. American Psychologist. ,vol. 50, pp. 741- 749 ,(1995) , 10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
Harold L. Kleinert, Jacqui Farmer Kearns, A Validation Study of the Performance Indicators and Learner Outcomes of Kentucky's Alternate Assessment for Students with Significant Disabilities The Journal of The Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps. ,vol. 24, pp. 100- 110 ,(1999) , 10.2511/RPSD.24.2.100