The Recent Advances in Decision Theory Under Uncertainty

作者: Alessandro Vercelli

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5083-9_11

关键词:

摘要: Decision theory under uncertainty (from now on DT) has played a remarkable role in many scientific disciplines such as economics, management, sociology, political science, law, philosophy, psychology, biology, even physics1. Any discipline involves relationship between an observer and object of study. DT may often intervene order to clarify the influence her object, or at least its description, explanation, forecast. More general, inductive (or abductive) inferences based empirical evidence are guided by procedures criteria which decision-theoretic, be rephrased these terms. In social sciences, analysis is taken be, reducible to, set past, present, prospective, individual collective decisions. Though impact been deep disciplines, it safe say that been, more more, economics (Anand (1993, p.l)). Not chance, main contributors this century, have either economists (Knight, Keynes, Morgenstern, Allais, Shackle, Ellsberg, Quiggin, Yaari, Kreps, etc.) scholars with strong interest (Ramsay, de Finetti, {ptvon} Neumann, Savage, Aumann, Machina, Schmeidler, Epstein, Gilboa, etc.).

参考文章(129)
A. Kirman, C. Oddou, S. Weber, Stochastic Communication and Coalition Formation Econometrica. ,vol. 54, pp. 129- 138 ,(1986) , 10.2307/1914161
Stephen J. DeCanio, Rational Expectations and Learning from Experience Quarterly Journal of Economics. ,vol. 93, pp. 47- 57 ,(1979) , 10.2307/1882597
Anthony C Fisher, W.Michael Hanemann, Quasi-option value: Some misconceptions dispelled☆ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. ,vol. 14, pp. 183- 190 ,(1987) , 10.1016/0095-0696(87)90015-5
Mark J. Machina, Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved Journal of Economic Perspectives. ,vol. 1, pp. 49- 82 ,(1987) , 10.1007/978-94-015-7957-5_2
R. H. Strotz, Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization The Review of Economic Studies. ,vol. 23, pp. 165- 180 ,(1955) , 10.2307/2295722
Deborah Frisch, Jonathan Baron, Ambiguity and rationality Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. ,vol. 1, pp. 149- 157 ,(1988) , 10.1002/BDM.3960010303
Hans-J�rgen Keppe, Martin Weber, Judged knowledge and ambiguity aversion Theory and Decision. ,vol. 39, pp. 51- 77 ,(1995) , 10.1007/BF01078869
Uzi Segal, The Ellsberg Paradox and Risk Aversion: An Anticipated Utility Approach International Economic Review. ,vol. 28, pp. 175- 202 ,(1987) , 10.2307/2526866
J. M. Keynes, The General Theory of Employment Quarterly Journal of Economics. ,vol. 51, pp. 209- 223 ,(1937) , 10.2307/1882087