Reconciling Internalization Theory and the Eclectic Paradigm

作者: Alan M. Rugman

DOI: 10.1108/1525383X201000007

关键词:

摘要: The eclectic paradigm of Dunning (1980) (with its OLI and four motives for FDI framework) can be reconciled with the firm country matrix Rugman (1981). However, fit is not perfect. main reason misalignment that focused upon outward into host economies, whereas Rugman’s firm‐level strategy covering MNE activity in both home countries

参考文章(25)
Alan M. Rugman, Jonathan P. Doh, Multinationals and Development ,(2008)
Oliver E. Williamson, Hierarchies and Markets International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. pp. 841- 844 ,(2015) , 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.73054-6
Oliver E Williamson, Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications : a study in the economics of internal organization Published in <b>1975</b> in New York (N.Y.) by Free press. ,(1975)
Alan M Rugman, Alain Verbeke, Liabilities of regional foreignness and the use of firm-level versus country-level data: a response to Dunning et al. (2007) Journal of International Business Studies. ,vol. 38, pp. 200- 205 ,(2007) , 10.1057/PALGRAVE.JIBS.8400242
Jean-François Hennart, A theory of multinational enterprise ,(1982)
John H. Dunning, Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests Journal of International Business Studies. ,vol. 11, pp. 9- 31 ,(1980) , 10.1057/PALGRAVE.JIBS.8490593