Quality of life in high myopia: implantable Collamer lens implantation versus contact lens wear.

作者: Alvin Ieong , Gary S. Rubin , Bruce D.S. Allan

DOI: 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2008.09.020

关键词:

摘要: Purpose To compare vision-related quality of life in implantable Collamer lens (ICL) recipients and successful contact (CL) wearers not seeking refractive surgery. Design A comparative cross-sectional study consecutive cases. Participants Forty-one cases bilateral ICL implantation Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, a control group 41 CL with similar starting level myopia attending consecutively at 1 2 community optometric practices the London area. Intervention Quality Life Impact Refractive Correction questionnaire administration semistructured interview. Main Outcome Measure score. Results scores were significantly higher ( P = 0.295), preoperative (ICL recipients) or uncorrected (CL wearers) error (mean spherical equivalent±SD, 11.0±2.7 vs. 11.3±3.5) wearers, respectively. Postoperative visual acuities (0.04 [20/20]±0.18) CL-corrected patients (0.01 [20/20]±0.14) measured better eye each also 0.53). Conclusions Implantable may offer significant quality-of-life advantages over wear for high myopia. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary commercial interest any materials discussed this article.

参考文章(29)
Christine Y Chen, Jill E Keeffe, Pam Garoufalis, Fakir MA Islam, Mohamed Dirani, Terry A Couper, Hugh R Taylor, Paul N Baird, None, Vision-related quality of life comparison for emmetropes, myopes after refractive surgery, and myopes wearing spectacles or contact lenses Journal of Refractive Surgery. ,vol. 23, pp. 752- 759 ,(2007) , 10.3928/1081-597X-20071001-04
Konrad Pesudovs, Estibaliz Garamendi, David B Elliott, A quality of life comparison of people wearing spectacles or contact lenses or having undergone refractive surgery. Journal of Refractive Surgery. ,vol. 22, pp. 19- 27 ,(2006) , 10.3928/1081-597X-20060101-07
ICL in Treatment of Myopia (ITM) Study Group, None, Postoperative inflammation after implantation of the implantable contact lens. Ophthalmology. ,vol. 110, pp. 2335- 2341 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00826-1
Isabelle Brunette, Jacques Gresset, Jean-François Boivin, Hélène Boisjoly, Héla Makni, Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy: Part 1: development and validation of a survey questionnaire Ophthalmology. ,vol. 107, pp. 1783- 1789 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00268-2
Gary S. Rubin, Beatriz Munoz, Karen Bandeen-Roche, Sheila K. West, Monocular versus binocular visual acuity as measures of vision impairment and predictors of visual disability. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 41, pp. 3327- 3334 ,(2000)
James R Dixon, THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONIZATION GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE Quality Assurance: Good Practice, Regulation, and Law. ,vol. 6, pp. 65- 74 ,(1999) , 10.1080/105294199277860
Peter J McDonnell, Carol Mangione, Paul Lee, Anne S Lindblad, Karen L Spritzer, Sandy Berry, Ron D Hays, NEI-RQL Research Group, Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument to Surgical Correction of Refractive Error Ophthalmology. ,vol. 110, pp. 2302- 2309 ,(2003) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2003.02.004
Susan Vitale, Oliver D Schein, Curtis L Meinert, Earl P Steinberg, The Refractive Status and Vision Profile: A questionnaire to measure vision-related quality of life in persons with refractive error Ophthalmology. ,vol. 107, pp. 1529- 1539 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00171-8
Sandra Berry, Carol M Mangione, Anne S Lindblad, Peter J McDonnell, Development of the National Eye Institute refractive error correction quality of life questionnaire: focus groups. Ophthalmology. ,vol. 110, pp. 2285- 2291 ,(2003) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2003.08.021