How scale and technology influence the energy intensity of water recycling systems-An analytical review

作者: R. Paul , S. Kenway , P. Mukheibir

DOI: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.12.148

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Many cities are moving towards increased use of recycled water to meet demand due freshwater scarcity, population growth, urbanisation and climate change. Water recycling requires substantial energy. utilities facing serious challenges providing cost-effective reliable services under rising energy cost. Energy is further linked with global change through carbon intensive Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) emissions. However, few studies have attempted understand the systems how intensity those varies scale technology. In this paper, we undertook a comprehensive systematic literature data review systems. We used four “cases”: (1) Centralised Potable (2) Non-Potable, (3) Decentralised (4) Non-Potable structure our work. Our analysis demonstrates decreases increasing size for wide range different treatment technologies. The centralised having capacity less than 5 MLD from 0.48 2.0 kWh/kL non-potable 0.75 2.0 kWh/k potable; capacities between 200 0.2 0.9 kWh/kL potable 0.25 0.75 kWh/kL non-potable; any greater MLD, 0.8 kWh/kL 0.55 kWh/kL But current 0.65 1.4 kWh/kL 21 378 0.6 1.0 kWh/kL 6 350 MLD. case decentralised systems, smaller consume higher but larger Systems (mid-size) lower intensity. Though system low, reuse treated dual pipe which involves good amount pumping long distance plant users. Pumping energy, in case, can vary 0.19 1.43 kWh/kL. selected technology train also influence on use. present trend produce high-quality all using Advanced Treatment uses do not necessarily require such high quality water. Little attention has been given introducing ‘fit purpose’ appropriate technologies (distributed) that potential reduce urban services.

参考文章(63)
Katey Lauer, Alice Howell, Patrick Morales, Jane Branham, Our Water, Our Future ,(2015)
M. Inman, S. J. Kenway, M. Hall, S. Seo, S. Cook, A. Priestley, A. Gregory, Energy use in the provision and consumption of urban water in Australia and New Zealand CSIRO. ,(2008)
Howard Frank, Reuse and recycle Coventry City Council. ,(2010)
Stuart J. Khan, Potable reuse of water Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology. ,vol. 1, pp. 550- 553 ,(2015) , 10.1039/C5EW90021B
Bart Verrecht, Thomas Maere, Ingmar Nopens, Christoph Brepols, Simon Judd, The cost of a large-scale hollow fibre MBR Water Research. ,vol. 44, pp. 5274- 5283 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.WATRES.2010.06.054
Jeffrey Foley, David de Haas, Ken Hartley, Paul Lant, Comprehensive life cycle inventories of alternative wastewater treatment systems. Water Research. ,vol. 44, pp. 1654- 1666 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.WATRES.2009.11.031
Caterina Levantesi, Rosanna La Mantia, Costantino Masciopinto, Uta Böckelmann, M. Neus Ayuso-Gabella, Miquel Salgot, Valter Tandoi, Emmanuel Van Houtte, Thomas Wintgens, Elisabeth Grohmann, Quantification of pathogenic microorganisms and microbial indicators in three wastewater reclamation and managed aquifer recharge facilities in Europe Science of The Total Environment. ,vol. 408, pp. 4923- 4930 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2010.07.042
Martin Rygaard, Philip J. Binning, Hans-Jørgen Albrechtsen, Increasing urban water self-sufficiency: New era, new challenges Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 92, pp. 185- 194 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2010.09.009
Pawel Krzeminski, Jaap H. J. M. van der Graaf, Jules B. van Lier, Specific energy consumption of membrane bioreactor (MBR) for sewage treatment. Water Science and Technology. ,vol. 65, pp. 380- 392 ,(2012) , 10.2166/WST.2012.861