Procedural conflict of appointment and production of Forensic building-technical expertise (FBTE) and methodological approaches for their resolution

作者: Svetlana Kolobova

DOI: 10.1051/MATECCONF/201710608005

关键词:

摘要: This paper analyzes the procedural conflicts arising from appointment and manufacture of forensic building-technical expertise methodical recommendations for their resolution. Inconsistencies in some provisions current legislation governinjudicial activities: concept expertise, legal status expert, name types classification judicial can lead to wrong conclusions errors. The methodological approaches legislative consolidation definition activities; changes civil code, arbitration code on administrative offences, Federal law state expert activity related unification forensic-expert terminology inclusion framework new concepts concerning activities. It is proposed amend procedure regarding timing execution аnd revision sanctions case untimely performance expertise.

参考文章(8)
Brian Wynne, Michael Lynch, Science and Technology Studies: Experts and Expertise International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. pp. 206- 211 ,(2015) , 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.85023-0
Nicholas Dew, Stuart Read, Saras D. Sarasvathy, Robert Wiltbank, Entrepreneurial expertise and the use of control Journal of Business Venturing Insights. ,vol. 4, pp. 30- 37 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JBVI.2015.09.001
Adrianna Kozierkiewicz-Hetmańska, The analysis of expert opinions' consensus quality Information Fusion. ,vol. 34, pp. 80- 86 ,(2017) , 10.1016/J.INFFUS.2016.06.005
Razieh Nadafianshahamabadi, Mohammad Tayarani, Gregory M. Rowangould, Differences in expertise and values: Comparing community and expert assessments of a transportation project Sustainable Cities and Society. ,vol. 28, pp. 67- 75 ,(2017) , 10.1016/J.SCS.2016.08.027
Ronald Miller, Brent E. Turvey, Judicial Ethics Ethical Justice. pp. 345- 375 ,(2013) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-404597-2.00011-5