Spatial prioritization for urban Biodiversity Quality using biotope maps and expert opinion

作者: Joel Jalkanen , Kati Vierikko , Atte Moilanen

DOI: 10.1016/J.UFUG.2020.126586

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Spatial prioritization can produce useful information about biodiversity values from urban areas. However, its typical focus on (endangered) species distributions assumes a rather restricted approach to biodiversity. In 2006, Feest suggested that five attributes of assemblages more holistically describe the so called “Biodiversity Quality” an area: richness, biomass, population density, evenness, and rarity. Here we apply these in spatial for biodiversity, across ten taxonomic groups: vascular plants, polypores, fungi (other than polypores), birds, bats, mammals bats), herpetofauna, butterflies, hymenoptera, beetles. addition, introduce two relevant conservation: support specialist regional representativeness assemblages. First, data local biotopes was acquired. For each taxon, capacity biotope seven introduced Biodiversity Quality evaluated via expert elicitation. Expert opinion then translated into analysis implemented with Zonation software. Different anthropogenic, semi-natural, natural habitats, such as herb-rich forests, lakeshores, open wastelands, fortifications, botanical gardens, were identified important Quality. To minimize negative impact future construction development should be directed built-up areas agricultural fields. Our conception lies between species- habitat/ecosystem -based analyses offers comprehensive perception only, which facilitates planning ecologically sustainable cities biodiverse green infrastructure.

参考文章(75)
Azadeh Karimi, Greg Brown, Marc Hockings, Methods and participatory approaches for identifying social-ecological hotspots Applied Geography. ,vol. 63, pp. 9- 20 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.APGEOG.2015.06.003
Christine Haaland, Cecil Konijnendijk van den Bosch, Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. ,vol. 14, pp. 760- 771 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.UFUG.2015.07.009
Marjo Kasanko, José I. Barredo, Carlo Lavalle, Niall McCormick, Luca Demicheli, Valentina Sagris, Arne Brezger, Are European Cities Becoming Dispersed? A Comparative Analysis of 15 European Urban Areas Landscape and Urban Planning. ,vol. 77, pp. 111- 130 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2005.02.003
Kati Vierikko, Jere Salminen, Niina Tamminen, Jari Niemelä, Joel Jalkanen, Helsingin kestävä viherrakenne Helsingin kaupunkisuunnitteluvirasto. ,(2014)
Erik Andersson, Urban Landscapes and Sustainable Cities Ecology and Society. ,vol. 11, pp. 34- ,(2006) , 10.5751/ES-01639-110134
Natsuki Murata, Alan Feest, A case study of evidence for showing ‘no net loss’ of bird biodiversity in a development project Water and Environment Journal. ,vol. 29, pp. 419- 429 ,(2015) , 10.1111/WEJ.12124
Katarina Löfvenhaft, Cristina Björn, Margareta Ihse, Biotope patterns in urban areas: a conceptual model integrating biodiversity issues in spatial planning Landscape and Urban Planning. ,vol. 58, pp. 223- 240 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00223-7
Sarah Adine Bekessy, Matt White, Ascelin Gordon, Atte Moilanen, Michael Andrew Mccarthy, Brendan Anthony Wintle, None, Transparent planning for biodiversity and development in the urban fringe Landscape and Urban Planning. ,vol. 108, pp. 140- 149 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2012.09.001
Atte Moilanen, Barbara J. Anderson, Felix Eigenbrod, Andreas Heinemeyer, David B. Roy, Simon Gillings, Paul R. Armsworth, Kevin J. Gaston, Chris D. Thomas, Balancing alternative land uses in conservation prioritization Ecological Applications. ,vol. 21, pp. 1419- 1426 ,(2011) , 10.1890/10-1865.1