Identifying target reference points for harvesting assessment-limited wildlife populations: a case study.

作者: Bryan S. Stevens , James R. Bence , William F. Porter , Michael L. Jones

DOI: 10.1002/EAP.1577

关键词:

摘要: Identifying appropriate strategies for sustainable harvest is a challenge many terrestrial vertebrate species because of uncertain system dynamics, limited data to inform population models, and potentially conflicting objectives that seek maintain populations at desirable levels. The absence monitoring assessment infrastructure needed regularly estimate abundance accentuates this species, limits application rigorous state-dependent frameworks decision making are commonly advocated in natural resource management. Reference points, which define management targets or triggers changing management, often used guide decision-making, but suffer from ambiguity when developed without explicit consideration uncertainty trade-offs among competing objectives. We describe an approach developing unambiguous target reference points assessment-limited using structured making, demonstrate the develop rates fall Wild Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) harvests face dynamics. use simulation analyses identify optimal accomplishing uncertainty, with robust performance over broad regions demographic model parameter space. parameters wildlife managers interact determine Turkeys, formally acknowledging range plausible values structurally results more conservative than suggested by previously published studies. framework described here provides conceptual quantitative extending our other while structural

参考文章(62)
James D. Nichols, Mitchell J. Eaton, Julien Martin, Thresholds for conservation and management: structured decision making as a conceptual framework Springer, New York, NY. pp. 9- 28 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-1-4899-8041-0_2
Byron K. Williams, James D. Nichols, Optimization in Natural Resources Conservation Springer, New York, NY. pp. 45- 65 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-1-4899-8041-0_4
Michael C. Runge, Terry Walshe, Identifying Objectives and Alternative Actions to Frame a Decision Problem Springer, New York, NY. pp. 29- 43 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-1-4899-8041-0_3
Richard A. Lancia, Thomas D. Nudds, Michael W. Collopy, Clait E. Braun, James D. Nichols, Raymond D. Dueser, Wayne R. Porath, Clifford J. Martinka, Nancy G. Tilghman, John G. Kie, ARM! For the Future: Adaptive Resource Management in the Wildlife Profession Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 24, pp. 436- 442 ,(1996)
Clinton T. Moore, William L. Kendall, Costs of detection bias in index–based population monitoring Animal Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 27, pp. 287- 296 ,(2004)
Richard Deriso, Risk Adverse Harvesting Strategies Resource Management. pp. 65- 73 ,(1985) , 10.1007/978-3-642-46562-8_4
Robert T. Clemen, Terence Reilly, Making Hard Decisions with DecisionTools ,(2013)
Fred A. Johnson, G. Scott Boomer, Byron K. Williams, James D. Nichols, David J. Case, Multilevel Learning in the Adaptive Management of Waterfowl Harvests: 20 Years and Counting Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 39, pp. 9- 19 ,(2015) , 10.1002/WSB.518
M Mangel Kareiva, J Moore, WW Murdoch, E Noonburg, AM Parma, MA Pascual, HP Possingham, C Wilcox, D Yu, Management of populations in conservation, harvesting and control Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 13, pp. 371- 375 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01381-0
James R. Bence, Martin W. Dorn, Brian J. Irwin, André E. Punt, Recent advances in the evaluation and implementation of harvest policies Fisheries Research. ,vol. 94, pp. 207- 209 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.FISHRES.2008.09.029