The Multi-attribute Utility Method

作者: Sylvia J. T. Jansen

DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8894-9_5

关键词:

摘要: In this chapter the methodology and techniques behind Multi-Attribute Utility Theory are introduced. The basic assumption underlying theory is that a decision-maker chooses alternative (for example, particular dwelling) yields greatest multi-attribute utility from number of possible alternatives. An seen as bundle attributes, such dwelling type rooms. assumed to evaluate every on each its salient attributes. Furthermore, importance attribute determined. Finally, values combined with weights aggregated into for alternative. highest expected be preferred. terms main dimensions distinguishing between methods measuring housing preference choice multi-Attribute method can characterized stated preferences providing an outcome in form utilities. approach attribute-based (compositional) mathematical. Often, simple-additive combination rule applied (compensatory rule), but non-compensatory rules (such multiplicative rules) also possible.

参考文章(29)
John W. Payne, James R. Bettman, Eric J. Johnson, The adaptive decision maker: Frontmatter ,(1993) , 10.1017/CBO9781139173933
Roland Goetgeluk, Bomen over wonen : woningmarktonderzoek met beslissingsbomen Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap : Faculteit Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen Universiteit Utrecht. ,(1997)
W. Edwards, D. Von Winterfeldt, Decision analysis and behavioral research Cambridge, MA (USA) Cambridge Univ. Press. ,(1986)
S. Musterd, A. Goethals, Methoden voor woning- en woonmilieubehoefte onderzoek SISWO publikatie. ,(1989)
H. Raiffa, R. L. Keeney, David W. Rajala, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs ,(1976)
James R. Bettman, John W. Payne, Eric J. Johnson, The adaptive decision maker ,(1993)
Paul Slovic, The Construction of Preference American Psychologist. ,vol. 50, pp. 364- 371 ,(1995) , 10.1037/0003-066X.50.5.364
James R. Bettman, Mary Frances Luce, John W. Payne, Constructive Consumer Choice Processes Journal of Consumer Research. ,vol. 25, pp. 187- 217 ,(1998) , 10.1086/209535
Pat Burnett, Variable Decision Strategies, Rational Choice, and Situation-Related Travel Demand: Environment and Planning A. ,vol. 40, pp. 2259- 2281 ,(2008) , 10.1068/A39287
Jianmin Jia, Gregory W. Fischer, James S. Dyer, Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: A simulation study Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. ,vol. 11, pp. 85- 105 ,(1998) , 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199806)11:2<85::AID-BDM282>3.0.CO;2-K