An experimental test of risk compensation: Between-subject versus within-subject analyses

摘要: This study examined parameters under which risk compensation in driving can occur following the use of safety belts. Risk theories hypothesize that if individuals belts, they will drive a more risky manner than do not belts due to an increased perception safety. Although existence has been debated literature for many years, current was first experimental analysis this theory permitted controlled examination both between-subject and within-subject effects. required subjects 5-hp. go-kart around oval track either buckled or unbuckled two phases 15 trials. After phase condition switched half (i.e., belt removed from using it used by who previously did it). Dependent measures included latency each lap, deviations prescribed lane, perceived while driving. The amount time took travel their during trip also measured. supported analyses research data; however, some comparisons demonstrate compensation. Subjects speed second significantly phases. suggested occurrence is dependent upon being able compare sensations with those belt. manifest itself studies because comparison could take place. implications automobiles on multi-user roadways discussed. Suggestions further expand knowledge about how when occurs are provided.