Globalization and the Great Divergence: terms of trade booms, volatility and the poor periphery, 1782–1913

作者: J. G. Williamson

DOI: 10.1017/S136149160800230X

关键词:

摘要: W. Arthur Lewis argued that a new international economic order emerged between 1870 and 1913, global terms of trade forces produced rising primary product specialization de-industrialization in the poor periphery. More recently, modern economists argue volatility reduces growth This article assesses these 1782 1913 during Great Divergence. First, it argues had been firmly established by 1870, transition took place century before, not after. Second, evidence from 1870–1939 confirms while improvements raised long-run rich core, they did do so Given secular boom, thus de-industrialization, was much bigger periphery before than after, one might plausibly infer help explain Third, growth-reducing also contributed to Terms greater core 1870. It still very big after certainly far core. Based on drawn 1870–2000, we know such lowers periphery, negative impact is big. Since even helps Divergence

参考文章(95)
Phyllis Deane, B. R. Mitchell, Abstract of British Historical Statistics ,(1962)
J. Richard Huber, Effect on Prices of Japan's Entry into World Commerce after 1858 Journal of Political Economy. ,vol. 79, pp. 614- 628 ,(1971) , 10.1086/259771
Changing economy in Indonesia Pacific Affairs. ,vol. 50, pp. 340- ,(1979) , 10.1007/978-94-009-8253-6
Joshua Aizenman, Nancy Marion, Volatility and Investment: Interpreting Evidence from Developing Countries Economica. ,vol. 66, pp. 157- 1179 ,(1999) , 10.1111/1468-0335.00163
STEPHEN BROADBERRY, BISHNUPRIYA GUPTA, The early modern great divergence: wages, prices and economic development in Europe and Asia, 1500–1800 The Economic History Review. ,vol. 59, pp. 2- 31 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1468-0289.2005.00331.X
W. Arthur Lewis, Growth and fluctuations, 1870-1913 ,(1978)
Daniel M Bernhofen, John C Brown, An empirical assessment of the comparative advantage gains from trade : Evidence from Japan The American Economic Review. ,vol. 95, pp. 208- 225 ,(2005) , 10.1257/0002828053828491
David Clingingsmith, Jeffrey G. Williamson, Deindustrialization in 18th and 19th century India: Mughal decline, climate shocks and British industrial ascent Explorations in Economic History. ,vol. 45, pp. 209- 234 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.EEH.2007.11.002
Mataji Miyamoto, Yōtarō Sakudō, Yasukichi Yasuba, Economic Development in Preindustrial Japan, 1859–1894 * The Journal of Economic History. ,vol. 25, pp. 541- 564 ,(1965) , 10.1017/S002205070005840X