The low α/β ratio for prostate cancer: What does the clinical outcome of HDR brachytherapy tell us?

作者: Jian Z Wang , X.Allen Li , Cedric X Yu , Steven J DiBiase

DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00747-8

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Purpose Accumulating evidence demonstrates that prostate cancer has a low α/β ratio. However, several challenging issues have been raised from previous studies, including the biologic equivalence between external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy, effect of relative effectiveness (RBE) for permanent implantation, systematic uncertainties multi-institutional multi-modality clinical data. The purpose this study is to address these by reexamining reported outcome high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy confirm ratio cancer. Methods materials generalized linear-quadratic (LQ) model with considerations sublethal damage repair clonogen repopulation was used calculate cell-killing efficiency treatments Standard models tumor cure based on Poisson statistics were bridge cell killing treatment outcome. data collected in trial using EBRT plus HDR boost at William Beaumont Hospital (WBH) reanalyzed. A 4-year post-treatment time endpoint chosen as compared 3-year because better maturity stability least chi-square method employed fit estimate LQ parameters well their confidence intervals. number clonogens tumors derived separate constraint modeling improve level. Results Our analysis only relationships among parameters, not definitive unique values, can be WBH set alone. This due large statistical uncertainties, i.e., small numbers sampled patients. By combining results obtained Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), new (α = 0.14 ± 0.05 Gy −1 , 3.1 −1.6 +2.6 Gy) current without dealing implants. are consistent implants consideration repopulation. provides interpretation currently available Conclusions further support about Gy. shows RBE implantation may clinically significant consistency found supports general opens door search more effective radiotherapeutic approaches cancer, e.g., hypofractionation radiotherapy.

参考文章(38)
Jian Z. Wang, M. Guerrero, X. Allen Li, HOW LOW IS THE / RATIO FOR PROSTATE CANCER? ,(2003)
Rick Chappell, Jack F. Fowler, Mark A. Ritter, In response to Drs. Dale and Jones International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. ,vol. 52, pp. 1428- ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)02815-2
Jian Z. Wang, M. Guerrero, X.Allen Li, How low is the α/β ratio for prostate cancer? International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 55, pp. 194- 203 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)03828-2
Howard D Thames, Warren D D’Souza, Deborah A Kuban, In response to Drs. King and Fowler International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 54, pp. 627- 628 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02923-1
David J. Brenner, In response to Dr. Logue et al. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 49, pp. 1522- 1523 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01564-9
Jack Fowler, Rick Chappell, Mark Ritter, Is α/β for prostate tumors really low? International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 50, pp. 1021- 1031 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01607-8
John P. Logue, Richard A. Cowan, Jolyon H. Hendry, Hypofractionation for prostate cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 49, pp. 1522- 1523 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01565-0
Jian Z Wang, X.Allen Li, Warren D D'Souza, Robert D Stewart, Impact of prolonged fraction delivery times on tumor control: a note of caution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 57, pp. 543- 552 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00499-1
Roger G. Dale, Bleddyn Jones, Is the α/β for prostate tumors really low? In regard to Fowler et al., IJROBP 2001;50:1021–1031 International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. ,vol. 52, pp. 1427- 1428 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)02814-0